Cases 51 - 60 of 164
CATO INSTITUTE v. FEDERAL BUREAU OF INVESTIGATION et al
as 1:2020cv03678
Defendant:
FEDERAL BUREAU OF INVESTIGATION and U.S. DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE
Plaintiff:
CATO INSTITUTE
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 552
CATO INSTITUTE v. FEDERAL BUREAU OF INVESTIGATION et al
as 1:2020cv03338
Defendant:
FEDERAL BUREAU OF INVESTIGATION and U.S. DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE
Plaintiff:
CATO INSTITUTE
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 552
Immigrant Legal Resource Center et al v. Wolf et al
as 4:2020cv05883
Plaintiff:
OneAmerica, Catholic Legal Immigration Network, Inc., Coalition for Humane Immigrant Rights and others
Defendant:
U.S. Citizenship & Immigration Services, Kenneth T. Cuccinelli, U.S. Department of Homeland Security and others
Amicus Curiae:
State of Hawaii, State of New York, State of Oregon and others
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702
Fiyyaz Pirani v. Slack Technologies, Inc., et al
as 20-16419
Defendant / Appellant:
ACCEL GROWTH FUND INVESTORS 2016 L.L.C., GRAHAM SMITH, SOCIAL+CAPITAL PARTNERSHIP GP II L.P. and others
Plaintiff / Appellee:
FIYYAZ PIRANI
Amicus Curiae:
CHAMBER OF COMMERCE OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, NATIONAL VENTURE CAPITAL ASSOCIATION, SECURITIES INDUSTRY AND FINANCIAL MARKETS ASSOCIATION and others
Roderick Bonner v. Pam Pace, et al
as 20-40424
Defendant / Appellee:
UTMB, GAYE KARRIKER, Law Librarian, PAM PACE, UTMB Medical Director and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
RODERICK L. BONNER
Cato v. Hargrove, et al
as 20-5061
Defendant / Appellee:
SKYLER HARGROVE, HEATH BROWNELL, J T SNODDY and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
SPENCER THOMAS CATO
Kelvin Jones, et al v. Governor of Florida, et al
as 20-12003
Not Classified By Court:
SERVICE, STATE OF NEBRASKA, THE STATE OF ARKANSAS and others
Defendant / Appellant:
GOVERNOR OF FLORIDA and FLORIDA SECRETARY OF STATE
Plaintiff / Appellee:
LUIS A MENDEZ, CURTIS BRYANT, LEE HOFFMAN and others
Amicus Curiae:
STATE OF ALABAMA
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.