Cases 51 - 60 of 80
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2013cv00362
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Canada v. Dominion Enterprises et al
as 4:2013cv00345
Defendant:
John Doe, Cross-Sell LLC and Dominion Enterprises
Plaintiff:
Darrell Canada
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Bank of England v. Lonoke County Property Owners' Multipurpose Improvement District No 10 et al
as 4:2013cv00268
Plaintiff:
Bank of England
Defendant:
Lonoke County Property Owners' Multipurpose Improvement District No 10 , William G Thompson , Elizabeth Thompson and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 78
Canada v. Dominion Enterprises et al
as 1:2013cv01036
Plaintiff:
Darrell Canada
Defendant:
Dominion Enterprises, LTM Company Dominion, LLC, Landmark Media Enterprises, LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 2721 Driver Privacy Protection Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2013cv01014
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 0277 Telephone Consumer Protection Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2012cv01115
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Lonoke County, Arkansas v. MERSCORP Inc et al
as 4:2012cv00257
Plaintiff:
Lonoke County, Arkansas
Defendant:
MERSCORP Inc , Mortgage Electronic Registration Systems Inc , Bank of America NA and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Lind v. Medicredit Inc et al
as 4:2012cv00242
Plaintiff:
Derek Lind
Defendant:
Medicredit Inc and John Does
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2011cv03080
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Cox v. Hendrix et al
as 4:2011mc00022
Plaintiff:
Richard L Cox
Defendant:
David Hendrix , Tandy Key , Ron Rehkopf and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
