Cases 51 - 60 of 2,597
ADT LLC et al v. Skyline Security Management, Inc. et al
as 9:2024cv80215
Plaintiff:
ADT LLC and The ADT Security Corporation
Defendant:
Skyline Security Management, Inc., Edwin Arroyave, Matthew Haynes and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Trademark
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00036
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
United States of America v. Ramos
as 24-785
Defendant:
GENARO RAMOS and Bandit
Plaintiff:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv24826
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
MEIRELLES DE AZEVEDO v. RAMOS MOREIRA
as 2:2023cv23283
Plaintiff:
VICTOR H. MEIRELLES DE AZEVEDO
Defendant:
LUDIMILA RAMOS MOREIRA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
USA v. Ramos
as 24-40080
Plaintiff / Appellee:
United States of America
Defendant / Appellant:
Deibi Ramos
Caraffa v. Unknown Leon, et al.
as 24-681
Plaintiff / Appellant:
ALFRED ERIK CARAFFA
Defendant / Appellee:
UNKNOWN LEON, c/o mail/property officer at Rincon, UNKNOWN RAMOS, housing unit 5 correctional officer, UNKNOWN PARTIES, named as unknown unlawful employees of ASPC- Tucson and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00034
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
United States of America v. Ramos
as 24-293
Not Yet Classified:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant / Appellant:
ORTEXIS RAMOS
Andino-Ramoset al v Mayorkas et al
as 4:2023cv04646
Plaintiff:
DALIA MELISSA ANDINO RAMOS, DONIS MANUEL MATAMOROS GARCIA, Dalia Melissa Andino-Ramos and others
Defendant:
Alejandro Mayorkas, Ur Jaddou and Wallace Carroll
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702 Administrative Procedure Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
