Cases 51 - 60 of 68
Cardenas-Tafoya v. Holder, Jr.
as 10-9568
Petitioner:
EFRAIN CARDENAS-TAFOYA
Respondent:
ERIC H. HOLDER, JR., Attorney General of the United States
USA v. Homero Tafoya-Montelongo
as 10-10177
Plaintiff - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant:
HOMERO TAFOYA-MONTELONGO
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2010cv00641
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2010cv00326
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
MILDENBERGER V US
as 10-5084
Plaintiff-Appellant:
Ann S. Macmillan, Athol Doyle Cloud, Jr., Brian Schmidt and others
Amicus Curiae:
South Florida Water Management District, South Florida Water Management District, South Florida Water Management District and others
Defendant-Appellee:
United States, United States, United States and others
TAFOYA v. AC DELCO AUTO SERVICE CENTER, INC. et al
as NV/2:09-CV-02395
Defendant:
AC DELCO AUTO SERVICE CENTER, INC
Plaintiff:
TAFOYA
Silva Bojorquez-Tafoya v. Eric Holder, Jr.
as 10-70309
Petitioner:
SILVA BOJORQUEZ-TAFOYA, AKA Silvia Tafoya-Bojorquez, AKA Silvia B. Silva
Respondent:
ERIC H. HOLDER, Jr., Attorney General
Jermaine Lee v. Department of Children and Family Services et al
as 2:2009cv07470
Plaintiff:
Jermaine Lee
Defendant:
Department of Children and Family Services, Department of Children and Family Services, David Natanz and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Forma Pauperis Denial
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2009cv02294
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2009cv13608
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination
Type:
Other Statutes
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
