Cases 51 - 60 of 5,233
Feinberg v. Chardo et al
as 1:2024cv00706
Plaintiff:
Hadassah Feinberg
Defendant:
Francis Chardo, Colin Zwally, Michelle Avery and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1964 Racketeering (RICO) Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2024cv00433
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
United States of America v. Echevarria (Heyward)
as 24-1060
Defendant:
TJON MACOLL, ANDREW ECHEVARRIA, JONATHAN RODRIGUEZ and others
Not Yet Classified:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Keritsis v. Luciano et al
as 1:2024cv00506
Plaintiff:
George Keritsis
Defendant:
Juan R. Luciano, Michael S. Burke, Theodore Colbert, III and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv14121
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv00354
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Berg, et al. v. County of Los Angeles, et al.
as 24-2433
Respondent:
KRIZIA BERG, GRACE BRYANT, NOELANI DEL ROSARIO-SABET and others
Petitioner:
COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES, a municipal entity and ALEX VILLANUEVA, Sheriff
NAJJAR v. SALAMEH et al
as 1:2024cv05043
Plaintiff:
KARIM P NAJJAR
Defendant:
RIAD SALAMEH, BANQUE DU LIBAN, BANK OF BEIRUT, S.A.L. and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961 Racketeering (RICO) Act
FORD v. MERCER et al
as 2:2024cv04894
Defendant:
TINGO GROUP, INC., DARREN MERCER, HAO CHEN and others
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL FORD
GXO Logistics Supply Chain, Inc. f/k/a XPO Logistics Supply Chain, Inc. v. Young Living Essential Oils, LC et al
as 3:2024xc00911
Plaintiff:
GXO Logistics Supply Chain, Inc. f/k/a XPO Logistics Supply Chain, Inc.
Defendant:
Young Living Essential Oils, LC
Respondent:
CR3 Partners
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
