Cases 61 - 70 of 104
Larkin v. Corrections Corporation of America et al
as 3:2013mc00099
Plaintiff:
Mark Larkin
Defendant:
Corrections Corporation of America, f/n/u Jenkins, f/n/u Carter and others
Jonas Malm v. Correction Corp of America, et al
as 13-20615
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JONAS MALM
Defendant - Appellee:
CORRECTION CORPORATION OF AMERICA and HOUSTON PROCESSING CENTER CCA
Smith v. Corrections Corporation of America
as 3:2013mc00085
Plaintiff:
James Douglas Smith
Defendant:
Corrections Corporation of America
Malm v. Correction Corporation of America et al
as 4:2013cv02756
Plaintiff:
Jonas Malm
Defendant:
Correction Corporation of America and Houston Processing Center CCA
Cause Of Action: 88 U.S.C. § 8888
Gibbs v. Corrections Corporation of America et al
as 3:2013mc00028
Plaintiff:
Michael T. Gibbs, Jr.
Defendant:
Corrections Corporation of America and Department of Corrections Association
Malone v. Correctional Corporation of America et al
as 3:2013mc00020
Plaintiff:
Aaron Malone
Defendant:
Correctional Corporation of America, f/n/u Brown, Glenda l/n/u and others
Lavern Berryhill v. USA, et al
as 13-5014
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Lavern Berryhill
Defendant - Appellee:
United States of America, United States Supreme Court Justices, 10th Circuit Judges and others
City of Youngstown v. Corrections Corporation of America
as 4:2012cv02723
Plaintiff:
City of Youngstown
Defendant:
Corrections Corporation of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Non-Motor Vehicle
BERRYHILL v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA et al
as 1:2012mc00533
Plaintiff:
LAVERN BERRYHILL
Defendant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, UNITED STATES SUPREME COURT JUSTICES, 10th CIRCUIT JUDGES and others
Cause Of Action: Civil Miscellaneous Case
Williams et al v. State of Tennessee et al
as 3:2012mc00072
Petitioner:
Anthony Troy Williams and Robyn Kelley
Respondent:
State of Tennessee, Bill Haslam, Karl Dean and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
