Other Statutes Cases
Cases 61 - 70 of 2,064
State of Texas v. USA
as 23-40653
Plaintiff / Appellee: State of Texas, State of Alabama, State of Arkansas and others
Defendant / Appellant: United States of America, Alejandro Mayorkas, Secretary, U.S. Department of Homeland Security, Troy Miller, Acting Commissioner, U.S. Customs and Border Protection and others
Intervenor Defendant / Appellant: Maria Rocha, Jose Magana-Salgado, Nanci J. Palacios Godinez and others
Intervenor: State of New Jersey
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv03114
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
Iesha Mitchell, et al v. City of Benton Harbor, MI, et al
as 23-1970
Plaintiff / Appellant: IESHA MITCHELL, Guardian and next friend of A.M., KEA N. BENNETT, Guardian and next friend of A.B. next friend of S.B., et al., CHRISTINE ANDERSON, Guardian and next friend of A.L.next friend of D.L. 1 next friend of D.L. 2 next friend of M.L. and others
Defendant / Appellee: CITY OF BENTON HARBOR, MI, MARCUS MUHAMMAD, MICHAEL O'MALLEY and others
Montoya et al v. Federal Emergency Management Agency et al
as 1:2023cv00977
Plaintiff: Michelle Montoya, Candace Seaverns, Joseph Seaverns and others
Defendant: Federal Emergency Management Agency, National Resources Conservation Services and Angela Gladwell
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201 Declaratory Judgment
ELLIS v. SEABREEZE MHP LLC We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 4:2023cv00177
Plaintiff: WILLIAM L ELLIS, SR
Defendant: SEABREEZE MHP LLC
Cause Of Action: 12 U.S.C. § 1725 Collection under Contract Guaranty
Steve Tyson v. Elizabeth Ellis
as 23-3933
Plaintiff / Appellant: STEVE TYSON
Defendant / Appellee: ELIZABETH A. ELLIS
ELLIS v. SECRETARY OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES
as 1:2023vv02043
Petitioner: LINDELL ELLIS
Respondent: SECRETARY OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 300 Vaccine Injury Act
Daretha Braziel, et al v. Gretchen Whitmer, et al
as 23-1954
Plaintiff / Appellee: DARETHA BRAZIEL, individually and on behalf of themselves and all other similarly situated Plaintiff Residents of the City of Benton Harbor, Michigan, next friend of RB, next friend of DB, next friend of DR, KEESHA JONES, individually and on behalf of themselves and all other similarly situated Plaintiff Residents of the City of Benton Harbor, Michigan, next friend of KJ, next friend of DJ, next friend of TC, next friend of KB, IEASHA JONES, individually and on behalf of themselves and all other similarly situated Plaintiff Residents of the City of Benton Harbor, Michigan and others
Defendant: GRETCHEN WHITMER, Governor, iindividually and in her official capacity, STATE OF MICHIGAN, Environment, Great Lakes & Energy, LIESL CLARK, Director, individually and in her official capacity and others
Defendant / Appellant: MARCUS MUHAMMAD, Mayor, individually and in his official capacity, MICHAEL O'MALLEY, Water Plant Operator, individually and in his official capacity and CITY OF BENTON HARBOR, MI, a Municipal Corporation, through the Benton Harbor Water Department
Book People, Incorporated v. Wong We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 23-50668
Plaintiff / Appellee: Book People, Incorporated, VBK, Incorporated, doing business as Blue Willow Bookshop, Association of American Publishers and others
Defendant / Appellant: Martha Wong, in her official capacity as the Chair of the Texas State Library and Archives Commission, Kevin Ellis, in his official capacity the Chair of the Texas State Board of Education and Mike Morath, in his official capacity as the Commissioner of the Texas Education Agency
Amicus Curiae: Texas State Representative Jared Patterson, American Civil Liberties of Texas, Dean Lawrence Sager and others
Tyson v. Ellis We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2023cv00273
Plaintiff: Steve Tyson
Defendant: Elizbeth Ellis
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?