Cases 61 - 70 of 591
ROBINSON v. FEDERAL BUREAU OF PRISONS
as 1:2022cv01098
Plaintiff:
JONTE ROBINSON
Defendant:
FEDERAL BUREAU OF PRISONS
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 551 Administrative Procedure Act
INDIANA FEDERAL COMMUNITY DEFENDERS v. US DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE et al
as 1:2022cv00994
Plaintiff:
INDIANA FEDERAL COMMUNITY DEFENDERS
Defendant:
US DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE, FEDERAL BUREAU OF PRISONS, FEDERAL BUREAU OF INVESTIGATION and others
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 552 Freedom of Information Act
THOMAS v. UNITED STATES et al
as 2:2022cv01302
Plaintiff:
GEORGE BERNARD THOMAS
Defendant:
UNITED STATES, ZANE D. MEMEGER, UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Breach of Contract
TROYA v. FEDERAL BUREAU OF PRISONS et al
as 1:2022cv00767
Plaintiff:
DANIEL TROYA
Defendant:
FEDERAL BUREAU OF PRISONS, MICHAEL CARVAJAL, ANDRE MATEVOUSIAN and others
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702 Administrative Procedure Act
In re: Terri McGuire-Mollica
as 22-10627
Petitioner:
In re: TERRI MCGUIRE-MOLLICA
Respondent:
FEDERAL BUREAU OF PRISONS, THE, UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, WARDEN and others
BLADES et al v. GARLAND et al
as 1:2022cv00279
Plaintiff:
JONATHAN BLADES and ANTWAN BUCHANAN
Defendant:
MERRICK B. GARLAND, MICHAEL CARVAJAL and FEDERAL BUREAU OF PRISONS
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 0706 Judicial Review of Agency Actions
Kareem MillhouseIn re: Kareem Millhouse
as 22-1031
Petitioner:
In re: KAREEM HASSAN MILLHOUSE
Respondent:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, B. MOTTERN, Senior Officer, BOUSSAUG, Senior Officer and others
Bralen Jordan v. BOP, et al
as 21-3301
Plaintiff / Appellant:
BRALEN LAMAR JORDAN
Defendant / Appellee:
FEDERAL BUREAU OF PRISONS, UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, CHARLES E. SAMUELS, JR., Director, General Counsel and others
Frank Pate v. BOP
as 21-5285
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Frank Pate
Defendant / Appellee:
Federal Bureau of Prisons, Director of BOP
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
