Cases 61 - 70 of 615
Caston v. Murillo et al
as 1:2021cv05919
Plaintiff:
Charles Caston
Defendant:
Cathy Murillo, Erica Brown, Richard L. Braddock and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Caston v. Turner et al
as 1:2021cv05918
Plaintiff:
Charles Caston
Defendant:
Sylvester Turner, Houston Live Stock and Radio, Olympic Committee and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Shoemaker et al v. Zeitlin et al
as 1:2021cv01668
Plaintiff:
Joseph Shoemaker, Richard Gindin, Demya Johnson and others
Defendant:
Richard Zeitlin, American Technology Services, LLC, Unified Data Services, LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 227
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2021cv05045
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Holley v. McCormick
as 21-2217
Petitioner / Appellant:
Kenny Roosevelt Holley
Respondent / Appellee:
Ned McCormick, Middletown Police Department, Ned Lamount, Govenor and others
Robert Chagolla, et al v. Bryan Cluff, et al
as 21-16352
Plaintiff / Appellant:
ROBERT CHAGOLLA and JACKIE CHAGOLLA
Defendant / Appellee:
DETECTIVE BRYAN CLUFF, Maricopa County Sheriff's Office, LT. TODD BATES, Maricopa County Sheriff's Office, SHERIFF PAUL PENZONE, Maricopa County Sheriff's Office and others
USA v. Alan McCormick
as 21-12814
Plaintiff / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant / Appellant:
ALAN LAMAR MCCORMICK
Nathaniel Webb v. John Godfrey
as 21-7184
Plaintiff / Appellant:
NATHANIEL R. WEBB
Defendant / Appellee:
WARDEN JOHN GODFREY, MARSHALL PIKE, JANICE GRIMES and others
Eugene Thomas v. Warden of McCormick Correctional Institution
as 21-7005
Petitioner / Appellant:
EUGENE THOMAS
Respondent / Appellee:
WARDEN, MCCORMICK CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTION
Respondent:
SOUTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2021cv03594
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
