Cases 61 - 70 of 330
USA v. Jessie Cox, et al
as 21-15066
Defendant:
HUI CHU POOLE, ANIMAL PLACE, DEBBIE DEVITO and others
Defendant / Appellant:
SARAH JANE SHEAHAN, MICHAEL W. SHEAHAN, JOSEPH R. & MICHELLE SHEAHAN and others
Plaintiff / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
RCCE et al v. Rick Shawke, et al
as 5:2021cv00038
Plaintiff:
Alan Steinbrecher, John W Vineyard, RCCE and others
Defendant:
Rick Shawke and Does two or more possible CA homeless people citizens of SOC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
David Streety v. Daniel Grand, et al
as 20-2277
Defendant / Appellee:
JEFF CONTRARAS, SARGENT MORAN, HEIDI E. WASHINGTON, Director of M.D.O.C. State of Michigan and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
DAVID STREETY
U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission v. Carebourn Capital, LP et al
as 1:2020cv07162
Respondent:
Booski Consulting, LLC, Carebourn Capital, LP, Carebourn Partners, LLC and others
Petitioner:
U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission
In re: Tronox Incorporated
as 20-3949
Defendant / Appellee:
Montgomery, McCracken, Walker & Rhoads, LLP, Natalie D. Ramsey and Leonard A. Busby
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Stanley Waleski, on his own behalf and on behalf of more than 4,300 similarly situated class members
Debtor:
In re: Tronox Incorporated
Lamorticella et al v. Worldwide Express, LLC et al
as 1:2020cv01701
Defendant:
Ruben Sorhegui Tile Distributors, Inc., Reinaldo Sorhegui, Ruben Sorhegui Tile, Inc. and others
Plaintiff:
Paul Lamorticella and Dream Designs and More, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Sabtecha More v. Kohls, Inc.
as 5:2020cv02420
Plaintiff:
Sabtecha More
Defendant:
Kohls, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 227
Federal Trade Commission v. Unknown Parties Deceiving Consumers
as 5:2020cv02494
Defendant:
One or More Unknown Parties Deceiving Consumers into Making Purchases through
Plaintiff:
Federal Trade Commission
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 0053
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
