Cases 61 - 70 of 69,561
GBA ASSOCIATES LIMITED PARTNERSHIP v. USA
as 1:2024cv00800
Plaintiff:
GBA ASSOCIATES LIMITED PARTNERSHIP
Defendant:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1491 Tucker Act
801 MAINE AVE NBL OWNER LLC v. USA
as 1:2024cv00811
Plaintiff:
801 MAINE AVE NBL OWNER LLC
Defendant:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1491 Tucker Act
SOUTHSTAR FINANCIAL, LLC v. USA
as 1:2024cv00799
Plaintiff:
SOUTHSTAR FINANCIAL, LLC
Defendant:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1491 Tucker Act
SIMMONS v. USA
as 1:2024cv00807
Plaintiff:
GEORGIA ANN SIMMONS
Defendant:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1491 Tucker Act
MCKNIGHT v. USA
as 1:2024cv00808
Plaintiff:
LESLIE MCKNIGHT
Defendant:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1491 Tucker Act
Petry et al v. Shell International Exploration and Production Inc. et al
as 4:2024cv01981
Plaintiff:
Aaron Petry
Defendant:
Shell International Exploration and Production Inc., Smart Fabricators of Texas, LLC, Precision Tension Solutions LLC and others
Cross Defendant:
Versabar Inc
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446 Petition for Removal
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 7:2024cv04023
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
TEVA PHARMACEUTICALS USA, INC. v. AMARIN PHARMA, INC. et al
as 3:2024cv04341
Plaintiff:
TEVA PHARMACEUTICALS USA, INC.
Defendant:
AMARIN PHARMA, INC., AMARIN PHARMACEUTICALS IRELAND LIMITED and AMARIN CORPORATION PLC
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 15 Antitrust Litigation
S.G. v. Bank of China Ltd.
as 24-1426
Plaintiff:
S.G., on behalf of themselves and others similarly situated and M.G., on behalf of themselves and others similarly situated
Defendant:
BANK OF CHINA U.S.A., BOC INTERNATIONAL HOLDINGS LTD, BOCI COMMODITIES & FUTURES (USA) LLC and others
O'Dea v. L'Oreal, USA
as ILN/1:24-CV-02762
Plaintiff:
O'Dea and Lucinda O'Dea
Defendant:
L'Oreal, USA
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
