Cases 61 - 66 of 66
Hancock County Board of County Commissioners v. AmerisourceBergen Drug Corporation et al
as 1:2018op45572
Defendant:
McKesson Corporation, Actavis Pharma, Inc. f/k/a Watson Pharma, Inc., Purdue Pharma L.P. and others
Plaintiff:
Hancock County Board of County Commissioners
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961 Racketeering (RICO) Act
Van Wert County Board of County Commissioners v. AmerisourceBergen Drug Corporation et al
as 1:2018op45571
Defendant:
McKesson Corporation, Actavis Pharma, Inc. f/k/a Watson Pharma, Inc., Purdue Pharma L.P. and others
Plaintiff:
Van Wert County Board of County Commissioners
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961 Racketeering (RICO) Act
County of Oneida, New York v. Purdue Pharma, L.P. et al
as 1:2018op45338
Plaintiff:
County of Oneida, New York
Defendant:
Janssen Pharmaceutica Inc., Purdue Pharma L.P., Mallinckrodt LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961
City Of Lima v. AmerisourceBergen Drug Corporation et al
as 1:2018op45333
Defendant:
McKesson Corporation, Actavis Pharma, Inc. f/k/a Watson Pharma, Inc., Purdue Pharma L.P. and others
Plaintiff:
City Of Lima
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961 Racketeering (RICO) Act
Franklin County Board of County Commissioners v. AmerisourceBergen Drug Corporation et al
as 1:2018op45162
Defendant:
McKesson Corporation, Actavis Pharma, Inc. f/k/a Watson Pharma, Inc., Purdue Pharma L.P. and others
Plaintiff:
Franklin County Board of County Commissioners
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961 Racketeering (RICO) Act
Smith County, Tennessee v. Purdue Pharma L.P. et al
as 1:2018op45029
Defendant:
Janssen Pharmaceutica Inc., Purdue Pharma L.P., Mallinckrodt LLC and others
Plaintiff:
Smith County, Tennessee
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
