Cases 71 - 80 of 2,502
Planned Parenthood Federation of America, Inc., et al. v. Center for Medical Progress, et al.
as 23-4398
Defendant / Appellant:
DAVID DALEIDEN, CENTER FOR MEDICAL PROGRESS, BIOMAX PROCUREMENT SERVICES, LLC and others
Defendant:
SANDRA SUSAN MERRITT, TROY NEWMAN, ALBIN RHOMBERG and others
Plaintiff / Appellee:
PLANNED PARENTHOOD FEDERATION OF AMERICA, INC., PLANNED PARENTHOOD: SHASTA-DIABLO, INC., doing business as Planned Parenthood Northern California, PLANNED PARENTHOOD MAR MONTE, INC. and others
Freeman v. Wright-Freeman
as 2:2023cv13271
Defendant:
Michael Wright-Freeman, Michael Wright, Brian Rasheen Washington and others
Plaintiff:
L. Gabrielle Freeman
United States of America v. Mata
as 23-4355
Plaintiff / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant / Appellant:
GABRIEL MATA
Stati et al v. Republic of Kazakhstan
as 1:2023mc00612
Petitioner:
Anatolie Stati, Gabriel Stati, Terra Raf Trans Traiding Ltd. and others
Respondent:
Republic of Kazakhstan
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1782 Letter rogatory - appointment
Rivera v. Lettire Construction Corp.
as 23-8060
Plaintiff / Appellee:
ROMAN DE GABRIEL RIVERA
Defendant / Appellant:
LETTIRE CONSTRUCTION CORP., MOTT CENTER, LLC, REDFERN FRP LLC and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv16918
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
Fernandez-Catalan v. Garland
as 23-4256
Petitioner:
JONATAN GABRIEL FERNANDEZ-CATALAN
Respondent:
MERRICK B. GARLAND, ATTORNEY GENERAL
Barbosa Silva, et al. v. Garland
as 23-4217
Petitioner:
FERNANDO BARBOSA SILVA, PALOMA RAFAELLA GOMES MARTINS and GABRIEL MARTINS SILVA
Respondent:
MERRICK B. GARLAND, ATTORNEY GENERAL
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2023cv04685
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
