Other Statutes Cases
Cases 71 - 80 of 778
Contant v. Bank of America Corporation
as 22-159
Plaintiff / Appellee: James Contant, on behalf of themselves and all others similarly situated, Martin-Han Tran, on behalf of themselves and all others similarly situated, Carlos Gonzalez, on behalf of themselves and all others similarly situated and others
Petitioner / Appellant: AMA Capital Management, LLC
Defendant: Bank of America Corporation, Bank of America, N.A., Merrill Lynch, Pierce, Fenner & Smith Inc. and others
Petitioner: FXDirectDealer, LLC (FXDD)
Bilinsky v. Gatos Silver, Inc. et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2022cv00453
Plaintiff: Michael Bilinsky
Defendant: Gatos Silver, Inc., Stephen Orr, Roger Johnson and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 77 Securities Fraud
In re: Interest Rate Swaps Antitrust Litigation
as 1:2016md02704
Defendant: Interest Rate Swaps Antitrust Litigation, Citigroup Global Markets Inc., J.P. Morgan Securities LLC and others
Plaintiff: Genesee County Employees' Retirement System, THE CITY OF PHILADELPHIA, Policemen's Annuity & Benefit Fund Of Chicago and others
Consolidated Plaintiff: Triangle T Partners, LLC
Not Classified By Court: Tradition America LLC, Tullett Prebon Americas Corporation and tpSEF, Inc.
Interested Party: The New York Times Company
Petitioner: Lawrence W. Gardner
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 15 Antitrust Litigation
Crews, Jr. v. RIVIAN AUTOMOTIVE, INC. et al
as 3:2022cv01433
Plaintiff: Charles Larry Crews, Jr.
Defendant: RIVIAN AUTOMOTIVE, INC., ROBERT J. SCARINGE, CLAIRE MCDONOUGH and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 77 Securities Fraud
UA Local 13 Pension Fund v. Bumble Inc. et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2022cv00624
Plaintiff: UA Local 13 Pension Fund
Defendant: Bumble Inc., Whitney Wolfe Herd, Anuradha B. Subramanian and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 77 Securities Fraud
City of Philadelphia et al v. Bank of America Corporation et al
as 1:2022mc00049
Plaintiff: City of Philadelphia, Mayor and City Council of Baltimore, Quinn Emanuel Urquhart & Sullivan, LLP and others
Defendant: Bank of America Corporation, Bank of America, N.A., Banc of America Securities LLC and others
City of Philadelphia v. Bank of America Corporation et al
as 0:2022mc00012
Respondent: Bank of America Corporation
Petitioner: The City of Philadelphia
Plaintiff: City of Philadelphia, Mayor of Baltimore, City Council of Baltimore and others
Defendant: Bank of America, N.A., Banc of America Securities LLC, Merrill Lynch, Pierce, Fenner & Smith Incorporated and others
Javelin Capital Markets LLC et al v. Bank Of America Corporation et al
as 1:2016cv03542
Defendant: Bank Of America Corporation, ICAP Capital Markets LLC, J.P. Morgan Securities LLC and others
Plaintiff: Javelin Capital Markets LLC and Javelin SEF, LLC
Interested Party: The New York Times Company
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 15 Antitrust Litigation
Contant v. Bank of America Corporation
as 21-3058
Plaintiff / Appellee: James Contant, on behalf of themselves and all others similarly situated, Martin-Han Tran, on behalf of themselves and all others similarly situated, Carlos Gonzalez, on behalf of themselves and all others similarly situated and others
Petitioner / Appellant: AMA Capital Management, LLC
Defendant: Bank of America Corporation, Bank of America, N.A., Merrill Lynch, Pierce, Fenner & Smith Inc. and others
Petitioner: FXDirectDealer, LLC (FXDD)
Contant v. Bank of America Corporation
as 22-19
Plaintiff / Appellee: James Contant, on behalf of themselves and all others similarly situated, Martin-Han Tran, on behalf of themselves and all others similarly situated, Carlos Gonzalez, on behalf of themselves and all others similarly situated and others
Petitioner / Appellant: AMA Capital Management, LLC
Defendant: Bank of America Corporation, Bank of America, N.A., Merrill Lynch, Pierce, Fenner & Smith Inc. and others
Petitioner: FXDirectDealer, LLC (FXDD)

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?