Cases 71 - 80 of 328
Kalkbrenner v. West Side Lending, LLC et al
as 1:2022cv00420
Plaintiff:
Joshua Kalkbrenner
Defendant:
West Side Lending, LLC, Jennifer Peters, Wolf River Development Company and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1964 Racketeering (RICO) Act
Animal Medical Center of Orland Park, Inc. v. Walgreen Co. et al
as 1:2022cv00233
Plaintiff:
Animal Medical Center of Orland Park, Inc.
Defendant:
Walgreen Co. and John Does 1-20
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 227
Rock Capital Markets LLC et al v. NatWest Markets Securities Inc. et al
as 1:2021cv06816
Plaintiff:
Rock Capital Markets LLC and Synova Asset Management LLC
Defendant:
NatWest Markets Securities Inc., NatWest Markets PLC, NatWest Group PLC and others
Chad Barnes v. Kris Henry, et al
as 21-17094
Plaintiff / Appellant:
CHAD BARRY BARNES
Defendant / Appellee:
KRIS HENRY and ALOHA OCEAN EXCURSIONS LLC
Defendant:
KRIS HENRY, INC., R.S. MARLIN INC., DBA Ali`i Ocean Tours, MARY LYN OLGETREE and others
Canfield v. SS&C Technologies Holdings, In
as 21-3086
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Latrecia Onunkwor, individually and individually and for her individual account damages on behalf of the DST SYSTEMS, INC. 401(K) PROFIT SHARING PLAN, David Ostermeyer, individually and individually and for his individual account damages on behalf of the DST SYSTEMS, INC. 401(K) PROFIT SHARING PLAN, Diana Weaver, individually and individually and for her individual account damages on behalf of the DST SYSTEMS, INC. 401(K) PROFIT SHARING PLAN and others
Defendant / Appellee:
SS&C Technologies Holdings, Inc., DST Systems, Inc., The Advisory Committee of the DST Systems, Inc., 401(k) Profit Sharing Plan and others
Defendant:
Ruane, Cunniff & Goldfarb, Inc. and John Does, 1-20
Mendon v. SS&C Technologies Holdings, In
as 21-3088
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Mark Mendon, individually and for his individual account damages on behalf of the DST SYSTEMS, INC. 401 (K) PROFIT SHARING PLAN and Jill Pehlman, individually and for her individual account damages on behalf of the DST SYSTEMS, INC. 401 (K) PROFIT SHARING PLAN
Defendant / Appellee:
SS&C Technologies Holdings, Inc., DST Systems, Inc., The Advisory Committee of the DST Systems, Inc., 401(k) Profit Sharing Plan and others
Defendant:
Ruane, Cunniff & Goldfarb, Inc. and John Does, 1-20
Connor v. ABT Document Processing, Inc. et al
as 2:2021cv04081
Plaintiff:
Jay Connor
Defendant:
ABT Document Processing, Inc. d/b/a A. Plus Student Loans, Aaron Amet, Ted Makros and others
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 227
Amazon Data Services, Inc. et al v. WDC Holdings LLC et al
as 1:2021mc00064
Plaintiff:
Amazon Data Services, Inc. and Amazon.com, Inc.
Defendant:
WDC Holdings LLC doing business as Northstar Commercial Partners, Sterling NCP FF, LLC, Manassas NCP FF, LLC and others
Intervenor Defendant:
Brian Watson, WDC Holdings LLC, PLW Capital I, LLC and others
Intervenor:
800 Hoyt LLC
Matt Schweder, et al v. Andrew Beshear, et al
as 21-6153
Plaintiff / Appellant:
MATT SCHWEDER, Individually and as Father and Guardian of P.S., ROBIN HARBOLT, Individually and as Guardian of P.H., LARRY NICHOLS and others
Plaintiff:
JANE AND JOHN DOES, 1-100
Defendant / Appellee:
ANDREW G. BESHEAR, Individually and officially as Governor of the Commonwealth of Kentucky, STEVEN STACK, Individually and in his official capacity as Kentucky Department of Public Health Commissioner,, ERIC FRIEDLANDER, Individually and in his official capacity as Secretary, Cabinet for Health and Family Services, and others
Amazon.com, Inc. et al v. WDC Holdings LLC d/b/a Northstar Commercial Partners et al
as 2:2021mc51478
Plaintiff:
Amazon.com, Inc.
Intervenor Defendant:
Amazon Data Services, Inc.
Intervenor Plaintiff:
800 Hoyt LLC
Defendant:
WDC Holdings LLC d/b/a Northstar Commercial Partners, Sterling NCP FF, LLC, Manassas NCP FF, LLC and others
Interpleader:
WDC Holdings, LLC, PLW Capital I, LLC and BW Holdings, LLC
Receiver:
Mark A Roberts
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
