Other Statutes Cases
Cases 71 - 80 of 128
COUNTY OF CALAVERAS, a political subdivision of the State of California et al v. McKinsey and Company, Inc.
as 1:2022at00842
Plaintiff: COUNTY OF CALAVERAS, a political subdivision of the State of California, THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA, acting by and through the COUNTY OF CALAVERAS, COUNTY OF FRESNO, a political subdivision of the State of California and others
Defendant: McKinsey and Company, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961 Racketeering (RICO) Act
COUNTY OF BUTTE, a political subdivision of the State of California et al v. McKinsey and Company, Inc.
as 2:2022at01082
Plaintiff: COUNTY OF BUTTE, a political subdivision of the State of California, THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA, acting by and through the COUNTY OF BUTTE, COUNTY OF LASSEN, a political subdivision of the State of California and others
Defendant: McKinsey and Company, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961 Racketeering (RICO) Act
County of Trinity et al,. v. McKinsey and Company, Inc. We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2022cv01905
Plaintiff: County of Trinity and The People of the State of California
Defendant: McKinsey and Company, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961 Racketeering (RICO) Act
City of Lakeport, California et al v. McKinsey and Company, Inc.
as 3:2022cv06468
Plaintiff: CITY OF LAKEPORT, CALIFORNIA, a municipal corporation, THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA, acting by and through the CITY OF LAKEPORT, COUNTY OF MENDOCINO, a political subdivision of the State of California and others
Defendant: McKinsey and Company, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961 Racketeering (RICO) Act
County of Butte et al v. McKinsey and Company, Inc. We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2022cv01912
Plaintiff: County of Butte, County of Lassen, County of Sacramento and others
Defendant: McKinsey and Company, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961 Racketeering (RICO) Act
Alleghany County, North Carolina et al v. McKinsey and Company, Inc.
as 5:2022cv00155
Plaintiff: Alleghany County, North Carolina, Anson County, North Carolina, Buncombe County, North Carolina and others
Defendant: McKinsey and Company, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961 Racketeering (RICO) Act
CASWELL COUNTY, NORTH CAROLINA et al v. MCKINSEY AND COMPANY, INC.
as 1:2022cv00904
Plaintiff: CASWELL COUNTY, NORTH CAROLINA, CITY OF GREENSBORO, NORTH CAROLINA, DAVIE COUNTY, NORTH CAROLINA and others
Defendant: McKinsey and Company, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961 Racketeering (RICO) Act
Beaufort County, North Carolina et al v. McKinsey and Company, Inc.
as 4:2022cv00129
Plaintiff: Beaufort County, North Carolina, Bertie County, North Carolina, Bladen County, North Carolina and others
Defendant: McKinsey and Company, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961 Racketeering (RICO) Act
County of El Dorado et al v. McKinsey and Company, Inc. We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2022cv01876
Plaintiff: County of El Dorado, County of Glenn, County of Modoc and others
Defendant: McKinsey and Company, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961 Racketeering (RICO) Act
San Benito County et al v. McKinsey and Company, Inc. We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2022cv06302
Plaintiff: San Benito County, City Of San Jose, The People of the State of California, acting by and through the County of San Benito and others
Defendant: McKinsey and Company, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961 Racketeering (RICO) Act

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?