Cases 71 - 80 of 208
Diarra Gakou v. Barr
as 19-1410
Respondent:
William P. Barr, United States Attorney General
Petitioner:
Mohamed Diarra Gakou, AKA Mohamed Diarra, AKA Bayagi Batchilly, AKA Mohammed Diarra, AKA Cherno Gaye, AKA Mohamad Diarra, AKA Muhammed Diarra
Mohamad Dalalli v. USA
as 19-1414
Respondent / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Petitioner / Appellant:
MOHAMAD ALI DALALLI
Ehsan Ouza v. City of Dearborn Heights, MI, et al
as 19-1393
Plaintiff / Appellant:
EHSAN MOHAMAD OUZA
Defendant / Appellee:
JORDAN DOTTER, CITY OF DEARBORN HEIGHTS, MI and GENE DERWICK
Roderick Brown v. U.S. Department of Justice
as 19-6434
Defendant:
MRS. CROGAN, Assistant Health Service Administrator, MR. B. PLAVI, Bates Unit Counselor, B. VON BLANKENSEE, Former Warden FCI Morgantown and others
Defendant / Appellee:
BARBARA VON BLANCKENSEE, Former Warden, FCI Morgantown, TIMOTHY TOMPKINS, Case Management Coordinator, FCI Morgantown def, UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
RODERICK BROWN
Ehsan Ouza v. City of Dearborn Heights, et al
as 19-1211
Undetermined:
CITY OF DEARBORN HEIGHTS, MI, EHSAN MOHAMAD OUZA, GENE DERWICK and others
Ehsan Ouza v. City of Dearborn Heights, et al
as 19-1191
Plaintiff / Appellee:
EHSAN MOHAMAD OUZA
Defendant / Appellant:
JORDAN DOTTER, CITY OF DEARBORN HEIGHTS and GENE DERWICK
Undetermined:
CITY OF DEARBORN HEIGHTS, MI
Mohamad Labade v. Activision Blizzard, Inc. et al
as 2:2019cv00423
Defendant:
Collister Johnson, Spencer Neumann, Activision Blizzard, Inc. and others
Plaintiff:
Mohamad Al Labade
MD Hossain v. William Barr
as 19-70070
Petitioner:
MD KHALID HOSSAIN, AKA Mohamad K. Hossain
Respondent:
WILLIAM P. BARR, Attorney General
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 6:2018cv01386
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2018cv05894
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
