Cases 71 - 80 of 191
Lonnie Snelling v. City of St. Louis, Missouri, et al
as 20-1033
Defendant:
Willie Prothro, DSN #?, Necessary Party - in their official capacity, Jane Doe Prothro, Officer, DSN #?, Necessary Party, in their official capacity, Chris Myess, Officer, DSN #?, in their official capacity and others
Defendant / Appellee:
Willie C. Hemphill, Jr., Individually and Owner, doing business as Cheyenne Contracting, Betty L. Williams, also known as Betty Johnson, also known as Betty L. Love, Christina Powderly, in her individual capacity and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Lonnie D. Snelling
Joseph McCoy v. Angel Gonzales, et al
as 19-17352
Plaintiff / Appellant:
JOSEPH RAYMOND MCCOY
Defendant / Appellee:
ANGEL GONZALES, C. BELTRAN, R. FISHER and others
Defendant:
KEN CLARK, Warden, A. ENENMOH and J. CLARK KELSO
Jorge Anderson-El, et al v. Michael Zeff, et al
as 19-56321
Defendant / Appellee:
STANLEY MIDDLEMAN, Individual, DBA Freedom Mortgage, GRAHAM HOLMES, Individual, DBA Reviron Realty, BRADLEY OLPIN SNELL, Individual, DBA Superior Court of California for the County of Riverside and others
Plaintiff:
KING ABDUL MUMIN-EL and JOYCE TRUMPET
Plaintiff / Appellant:
JORGE ANDERSON-EL
T-Mobile Northeast LLC v. The Town of Barnstable, et al
as 19-2121
Not Yet Classified:
LORRAINE O'CONNOR and NANCY SNELL
Defendant / Appellee:
HERBERT BODENSIEK, TODD WALANTIS, PATRICK FORAN and others
Plaintiff / Appellee:
T-MOBILE
Klein v. Snell & Wilmer
as 2:2019cv00853
Defendant:
Snell & Wilmer
Plaintiff:
R. Wayne Klein
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 1367
Michael Snelling, Jr. v. Baldwin State Prison, et al
as 19-14232
Defendant / Appellee:
JEFFERSON, LUNKIN, FARLEY and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
MICHAEL J. SNELLING, JR.
Snell v. Neville, et al
as 19-2018
Defendant / Appellee:
PATRICIA RUZE, MONSERRATE QUINONES, STEPHANIE Y. COLLINS and others
Defendant:
THOMAS DEMOURA, THERESA SMITH, CLESELY M. GARCIA and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
EMORY G. SNELL, JR.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
