Cases 71 - 80 of 486
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2019cv12189
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 0227
Canfornav Inc. v. TDE Group USA, Inc.
as 2:2019cv11906
Plaintiff:
Canfornav Inc.
Defendant:
TDE Group USA, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1333
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2019cv00500
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 227
County of Cheboygan v. Purdue Pharma L.P. et al
as 1:2019cv11769
Defendant:
McKesson Corporation, Actavis Pharma, Inc. f/k/a Watson Pharma, Inc., Purdue Pharma L.P. and others
Plaintiff:
County of Cheboygan
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1962
Kalamazoo, County of v. Purdue Pharma L.P. et al
as 1:2019cv00439
Defendant:
ACTAVIS LLC,, PURDUE PHARMA L.P., McKESSON CORPORATION, and others
Plaintiff:
Kalamazoo County, Michigan and Kalamazoo, County of
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961
Calhoun, County of v. Purdue Pharma L.P. et al
as 1:2019cv00438
Defendant:
ACTAVIS LLC,, Purdue Pharma L.P., McKESSON CORPORATION, and others
Plaintiff:
CALHOUN COUNTY, MICHIGAN and Calhoun, County of
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961
Charter Township of Pittsfield, Michigan v. Purdue Pharma L.P. et al
as 2:2019cv11703
Defendant:
McKesson Corporation, ACTAVIS PHARMA, INC. f/k/a WATSON PHARMA, INC., Purdue Pharma L.P. and others
Plaintiff:
Charter Township of Pittsfield, Michigan
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2019cv11675
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2019cv00074
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2019cv10896
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
