Cases 71 - 80 of 1,828
Wakefield v. Walgreens Boots Alliance, Inc.
as 1:2023cv02051
Plaintiff:
Rachel Wakefield
Defendant:
Walgreens Boots Alliance, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-(Citizenship)
In re Bystolic Antitrust Litigation
as 23-420
Debtor:
In re: Watson Laboratories, Inc.
Plaintiff:
J M Smith Corporation, on behalf of itself and all others similarly situated, DBA Smith Drug Company, KPH Healthcare Services, Inc., individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated also known as Kinney Drugs, Inc, Albertsons Companies, Inc. and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
UFCW local 1500 Welfare Fund, Teamsters Western Region & Local 177 Health Care Plan, Fraternal Order Of Police Miami Lodge 20, Insurance Trust Fund and others
Defendant / Appellee:
Forest Laboratories Inc., Forest Laboratories Ireland, LTD, Forest Laboratories Holdings Ltd. and others
In re Bystolic Antitrust Litigation
as 23-418
Debtor:
In re: Watson Laboratories, Inc.
Plaintiff:
J M Smith Corporation, on behalf of itself and all others similarly situated, DBA Smith Drug Company, KPH Healthcare Services, Inc., individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated also known as Kinney Drugs, Inc, UFCW local 1500 Welfare Fund and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Albertsons Companies, Inc., H-E-B L.P., The Kroger Co. and others
Defendant / Appellee:
Forest Laboratories Inc., Forest Laboratories Ireland, LTD, Forest Laboratories Holdings Ltd. and others
In re: In re Bystolic Antitrust Litigation
as 23-423
Debtor:
In re: Watson Laboratories, Inc.
Plaintiff:
UFCW local 1500 Welfare Fund, Teamsters Western Region & Local 177 Health Care Plan, Fraternal Order Of Police Miami Lodge 20, Insurance Trust Fund and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
J M Smith Corporation, on behalf of itself and all others similarly situated, DBA Smith Drug Company and KPH Healthcare Services, Inc., individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated also known as Kinney Drugs, Inc
Defendant / Appellee:
Forest Laboratories Inc., Forest Laboratories Ireland, LTD, Forest Laboratories Holdings Ltd. and others
In Re: Valsartan Losartan and Irbesartan Products
as 23-8006
Petitioner:
CVS PHARMACY INC, RITE AID CORP, WALGREEN CO and others
Respondent:
CONSUMER ECONOMIC LOSS PLAINTIFFS, THIRD-PARTY PAYOR PLAINTIFFS and MEDICAL MONITORING PLAINTIFFS
Not Yet Classified:
PRODUCT LIABILITY ADVISORY COUNCIL INC
Board of Commissioners for Lucas County, Ohio et al v. Purdue Pharma L.P. et al
as 1:2018op46177
Defendant:
McKesson Corporation, Purdue Pharma L.P., Mallinckrodt LLC and others
Plaintiff:
Lucas County Children Services Board of Trustees, Board of Commissioners for Lucas County, Ohio and Mental Health & Recovery Services Board of Lucas County
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961 Racketeering (RICO) Act
Blackfeet Tribe of The Blackfeet Indian Reservation v. AmerisourceBergen Drug Corporation et al
as 1:2018op45749
Defendant:
McKesson Corporation, Endo Health Solutions, Inc., Purdue Pharma L.P. and others
Plaintiff:
The Blackfeet Tribe of The Blackfeet Indian Reservation and Blackfeet Tribe of the Blackfeet Indian Reservation
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961 Racketeering (RICO) Act
Jeske et al v. GlaxoSmithKline et al
as 1:2023cv10766
Plaintiff:
Joseph A. Jeske and Jan M. Jeske
Defendant:
GlaxoSmithKline, Pifzer, Sanofi and others
City of Barberton et al v. Purdue Pharma, L.P., et al
as 1:2018op45767
Plaintiff:
Irving B. Sugerman, Brad Bryan, Valley Fire District and others
Defendant:
Anda, Inc., Mallinckrodt LLC, Par Pharmaceutical, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1964 Racketeering (RICO) Act
Lytton Band of Pomo Indians v. AmerisourceBergen Drug Corporation et al
as 1:2019op45580
Defendant:
McKesson Corporation, Purdue Pharma L.P., Mallinckrodt LLC and others
Plaintiff:
Lytton Band of Pomo Indians
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961 Racketeering (RICO) Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
