Other Statutes Cases
Cases 81 - 90 of 806
Henry v. State of Washington We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2022cv05673
Plaintiff: Nicholus Rolfton Henry
Defendant: State of Washington
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 552 Freedom of Information Act
In re: Washington Cattlemen's Association, et al v. USDC-CAOAK
as 22-70194
Not Classified By Court: In re: WASHINGTON CATTLEMEN'S ASSOCAITION, PACIFIC LEGAL FOUNDATION, STATE OF ALABAMA and others
Petitioner: AMERICAN FARM BUREAU FEDERATION, AMERICAN FOREST RESOURCE COUNCIL, AMERICAN PETROLEUM INSTITUTE and others
Respondent: UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA, OAKLAND
Fund Texas Choice et al v. Paxton et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2022cv00859
Plaintiff: Fund Texas Choice, The North Texas Equal Access Fund, The Lilith Fund for Reproductive Equity and others
Defendant: Ken Paxton, Susan R. Deski, Julie Renken and others
Amicus Curiae: Physicians For Reproductive Health, State of California, State of Colorado and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201 Constitutionality of State Statute(s)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2022cv03253
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 12 U.S.C. § 4901 Dodd-Frank Act
Huy-Ying Chen v. Court of Appeals of the State of Washington - Divi
as 22-70165
Not Classified By Court: In re: HUY-YING CHEN, BANK OF NEW YORK MELLON TRUST COMPANY, N.A., as Successor to JP Morgan Chase Bank NA, as Trustee for Residential Asset Mortgage Products Inc., Mortgage Asset-Backed Pass-Through Certificates of Series 2005-RP3, JP MORGAN CHASE BANK, N.A., as Trustee, Successor in Interest to the Chase Manhattan Bank NA fka Chase Manhattan Bank and others
Petitioner: HUY-YING CHEN
Respondent: COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF WASHINGTON - DIVISION 1
Federal Trade Commission v. Meta Platforms Inc., et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 5:2022cv04325
Plaintiff: Federal Trade Commission
Defendant: Meta Platforms Inc.,, Within Unlimited, Inc., Mark Zuckerberg and others
Interested Party: Apple Inc., Alphabet Inc., Nike, Inc. and others
Amicus Curiae: State of New York, State of Alaska, State of California and others
Not Classified By Court: ByteDance Inc., Valve Corporation, HTC America, Inc. and others
Petitioner: Forte Nexus, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 0053 Federal Trade Commission Act
State of California, et al v. Debra Haaland, et al
as 22-16095
Plaintiff / Appellee: STATE OF CALIFORNIA, COMMONWEALTH OF MASSACHUSETTS, STATE OF MARYLAND and others
Defendant / Appellee: DEBRA ANNE HAALAND, U.S. Secretary of the Interior, UNITED STATES FISH AND WILDLIFE SERVICE, GINA RAIMONDO, U.S. Secretary of Commerce and others
Intervenor Defendant / Appellant: WASHINGTON CATTLEMEN'S ASSOCIATION, PACIFIC LEGAL FOUNDATION, STATE OF ALABAMA and others
State of California, et al v. Debra Haaland, et al
as 22-16094
Plaintiff / Appellee: STATE OF CALIFORNIA, COMMONWEALTH OF MASSACHUSETTS, STATE OF MARYLAND and others
Defendant / Appellee: DEBRA ANNE HAALAND, U.S. Secretary of the Interior, UNITED STATES FISH AND WILDLIFE SERVICE, GINA RAIMONDO, U.S. Secretary of Commerce and others
Intervenor Defendant / Appellant: STATE OF ALABAMA, STATE OF ALASKA, STATE OF ARIZONA, ex rel. the Arizona Game and Fish Commission and others
State of California, et al v. Debra Haaland, et al
as 22-16096
Plaintiff / Appellee: STATE OF CALIFORNIA, COMMONWEALTH OF MASSACHUSETTS, STATE OF MARYLAND and others
Defendant / Appellee: DEBRA ANNE HAALAND, U.S. Secretary of the Interior, UNITED STATES FISH AND WILDLIFE SERVICE, GINA RAIMONDO, U.S. Secretary of Commerce and others
Intervenor Defendant / Appellant: AMERICAN FARM BUREAU FEDERATION, AMERICAN FOREST RESOURCE COUNCIL, AMERICAN PETROLEUM INSTITUTE and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2022cv04260
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 0045 Federal Trade Commission Act

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?