Cases 81 - 90 of 251
United States of America v. US Currency $383,590
as 3:2021cv00293
Defendant:
$383,590 in U.S. Currency and US Currency $383,590
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 21 U.S.C. § 0881
We CBD, LLC v. The United States of America et al
as 3:2021cv00115
Plaintiff:
We CBD, LLC
Defendant:
US Customs and Border Protection, The United States of America and U.S. Customs and Border Protection
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Campbell v. United States of America
as 5:2021cv00047
Plaintiff:
Gerald Campbell
Defendant:
Katherine Hough and UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. PILKINGTON NORTH AMERICA, INC.
as 1:2021cv00040
Defendant:
PILKINGTON NORTH AMERICA, INC.
Plaintiff:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 7413
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. WALTER KIDDE PORTABLE EQUIPMENT, INC.
as 1:2020cv01172
Defendant:
WALTER KIDDE PORTABLE EQUIPMENT, INC.
Plaintiff:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
United States of America v. PCL Civil Constructors, Inc.
as 2:2020cv00090
Defendant:
PCL Civil Constructors, Inc.
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Rader v. United States of America
as 5:2020cv00636
Plaintiff:
Todd Rader
Defendant:
Nathaniel Hermann and UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442
Rogers v. United States of America
as 5:2020cv00637
Defendant:
Nathaniel Hermann and UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Plaintiff:
Shane Rogers
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442
Pollard v. United States of America
as 5:2020cv00640
Defendant:
Nathaniel Hermann and UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Plaintiff:
Marciella Pollard
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442
Leebcor Services, LLC v. United States Army Corps of Engineers et al
as 5:2020cv00607
Defendant:
John T.C. Hill, Colonel Jason E. Kelly, The Honorable Ryan McCarthy and others
Plaintiff:
Leebcor Services, LLC
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
