Cases 81 - 90 of 4,628
Johnson v. United States District Court for the Eastern District of California, Sacramento
as 24-438
Petitioner:
KENT KNOX JOHNSON
Respondent:
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA, SACRAMENTO
Not Classified By Court:
EL DORADO COUNTY SUPERIOR COURT, DAVID L. DEVORE, MICHAEL J. MCLAUGHLIN and others
Walker v. Wells Fargo Bank, National Association
as 24-428
Plaintiff / Appellant:
ROSEMARY HELEN ZIZIROS WALKER
Defendant / Appellee:
WELLS FARGO BANK, NATIONAL ASSOCIATION
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv00007
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Warren v. Walker John & Debra Trust, et al.
as 24-384
Plaintiff / Appellant:
ALLANNA WARREN
Defendant / Appellee:
PROGRESS RESIDENTIAL BORROWER 8 L L C, Z C C FAMILY TRUST / CAMACHO ROBERTA TRS, WALKER JOHN & DEBRA TRUST and others
Warren v. Walker John & Debra Trust, et al.
as 24-385
Plaintiff / Appellant:
ALLANNA WARREN
Defendant / Appellee:
PROGRESS RESIDENTIAL BORROWER 8 L L C, Z C C FAMILY TRUST / CAMACHO ROBERTA TRS, WALKER JOHN & DEBRA TRUST and others
Warren v. Walker John & Debra Trust, et al.
as 24-303
Plaintiff / Appellant:
ALLANNA WARREN
Defendant / Appellee:
WALKER JOHN & DEBRA TRUST, BERHAN AHMEN, PROGRESS RESIDENTIAL BORROWER 8 L L C and others
Terrell v. Portfolio Recovery Associates LLC
as 3:2024cv00047
Plaintiff:
Eli Terrell, Armando Aguilar, Michael Arroyo and others
Defendant:
Portfolio Recovery Associates LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Walker v. Walker
as 24-125
Plaintiff / Appellant:
JUSTIN WALKER and El Dey Bey Shabazz Ali
Defendant / Appellee:
JACQUELINE WALKER
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv02156
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
