Cases 1 - 10 of 713
Ingram v. Neptune Auto Transport LLC
as 1:2024cv06591
Plaintiff:
Travis Ingram
Defendant:
Neptune Auto Transport LLC
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 227 Restrictions of Use of Telephone Equipment
Morningstar v. Lightening Source, LLC et al
as 3:2024cv01104
Defendant:
Ingram Book Group, LLC, Lightening Source, LLC, Ingram Content Group, LLC and others
Plaintiff:
Akecheta Morningstar
Cause Of Action: 09 U.S.C. § 0010 Petition to Vacate Arbitration Award
Jackson v. Ingram et al
as 1:2024cv03625
Plaintiff:
Liquetta Jackson
Respondent:
Comprehensive Spine & Pain, LLC
Defendant:
Randy Ingram, R&T Trucking, John Doe Corporations 1-3 and others
Cause Of Action: FRCP 45(d) Motion to enforce subpoena for taking Deposition
Jackson v. Ingram et al
as 1:2024mi00081
Defendant:
Randy Ingram, Great West Casualty Company, John Doe Corporations 1-3 and others
Plaintiff:
Liquetta Jackson
Respondent:
Comprehensive Spine & Pain, LLC
Cause Of Action: FRCP 45(d) Motion to enforce subpoena for taking Deposition
United States of America v. Reid (Walker)
as 24-2030
Defendant:
Casanova, ISAIAH SANTOS, Beagle and others
:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
INGRAM v. NOVO NORDISK A/S et al
as PAE/2:24-cv-03341
Defendant:
NOVO NORDISK A/S and NOVO NORDISK INC.
Plaintiff:
LISA INGRAM
United States of America v. Reid
as 24-1521
Defendant:
DWIGHT REID, CASWELL SENIOR, CHRISTOPHER ERSKINE and others
Not Yet Classified:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Ingram v. Stockearnings, Inc.
as 5:2024cv03201
Plaintiff:
Warren Ingram
Defendant:
Stockearnings, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 227 Restrictions of Use of Telephone Equipment
United States of America v. Goodman (Evans)
as 24-1258
Defendant:
WILLIE EVANS, JERLAINE LITTLE, DARON GOODMAN and others
Not Yet Classified:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
In re: Herman Ingram
as 24-11288
Petitioner:
In re: HERMAN INGRAM
Respondent:
ATTORNEY GENERAL, STATE OF GEORGIA
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
