Cases 1 - 10 of 6,336
United States of America v. Williams (Bynum)
as 24-1337
Defendant:
WILLIAM BYNUM, ALAN ANDERSON, TERRENCE WILLIAMS and others
Not Yet Classified:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
United States of America v. Williams (Bynum)
as 24-1253
Defendant:
WILLIAM BYNUM, ALAN ANDERSON, TERRENCE WILLIAMS and others
Not Yet Classified:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Watson et al v. Thor Motor Coach
as 5:2024cv00788
Plaintiff:
Mark D Watson and Mary E Watson
Defendant:
Thor Motor Coach, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 2301 Magnuson-Moss Warranty Act
Joe Manis v. USDA
as 24-1367
Plaintiff:
JOE MANIS
Defendant:
UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE, THOMAS JAMES VILSACK, in his official capacity as the Secretary of Agriculture and MICHAEL WATSON, in his official capacity as Administrator of the Animal and Plant Health Administration
Watson v. Levy & Associates, LLC
as 1:2024cv00223
Plaintiff:
Jonathon Watson
Defendant:
Levy & Associates, LLC
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
1925 Hooper LLC et al v. Watson Realty Corp. et al
as 3:2024cv00374
Plaintiff:
1925 Hooper LLC, Robert J. Arko and Andrew M. Moore
Defendant:
Watson Realty Corp., Premiere Plus Realty Co., Charles Rutenberg Realty, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 0001 Antitrust Litigation
Harper v. Amur Equipment Finance, Inc, et al.
as 24-2413
Plaintiff:
JOHN HARPER
Defendant:
AMUR EQUIPMENT FINANCE, INC, WATSON & CHELIN MANUFACTERING, INC and ARTISAN AND TRUCKERS CASUALTY COMPANY
United States of America v. Artis (Campbell)
as 24-922
Defendant:
MALIK CAMPBELL, SOLOMON ARTIS, LEONARD BARLETTO and others
Not Yet Classified:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Lawyers For Fair Reciprocal Admission v. United States of America, et al.
as 24-2213
Plaintiff:
LAWYERS FOR FAIR RECIPROCAL ADMISSION
Defendant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, MERRICK B. GARLAND, ATTORNEY GENERAL, MARY H. MURGUIA, CHIEF CIRCUIT JUDGE and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
