Cases 1 - 10 of 55
JR et al v. Mancino et al
as 2:2023cv02519
Plaintiff:
JR and Jane Roe
Defendant:
Michele Mancino, Thomas E Aspinwall, Telegram Messenger Inc. doing business as Telegram and others
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 0151 Communications Act
WOGAN v. BRANCH MESSENGER et al
as 3:2022cv18819
Plaintiff:
TERRENCE WOGAN, II
Defendant:
BRANCH MESSENGER, DDI and EVOLVE BANK AND TRUST
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Aitchison et al v. Ford Motor Company
as DE/1:22-CV-00840
Plaintiff:
Aitchison, Richard Aitchison Aitchison, Miranda Anderson and others
Defendant:
Ford Motor Company
Mercurio et al v. Ford Motor Company
as DE/1:22-CV-00804
Plaintiff:
Mercurio, Brittany Paul, Deana Redden and others
Defendant:
Ford Motor Company
Union City Daily Messenger, Inc. v. Google, LLC et al
as 1:2022cv01704
Plaintiff:
Union City Daily Messenger, Inc.
Defendant:
Google LLC and Facebook Inc.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 15 Antitrust Litigation
Union City Daily Messenger, Inc. v. Google, LLC et al
as 1:2022cv01027
Plaintiff:
Union City Daily Messenger, Inc.
Defendant:
Google, LLC and Facebook, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 15 Antitrust Litigation
In re: Google Digital Advertising Antitrust Litigation
as 1:2021md03010
Plaintiff:
Associated Newspapers Ltd., Mail Media, Inc., Emmerich Newspapers, Incorporated and others
Defendant:
Google LLC, Alphabet Inc., Facebook Inc. and others
Interpleader:
State of Louisiana and State of South Carolina
Interested Party:
The Nation Company, L.P., Genius Media Group, Inc., Mikula Web Solutions, Inc. and others
Amicus Curiae:
Reporters Committee for Freedom of the Press and 23 Media Organizations
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 2 Antitrust Litigation
Percy et al v. D & D Metal Work Inc et al
as NYE/1:21-CV-02182
Plaintiff:
Percy, Albert E. Percy and Percy Jobs and Careers Corporation
Defendant:
D & D Metal Work Inc, Delta, Eng-Wong, Taub & Associates and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
