Cases 1 - 10 of 448
Watkins, et al. v. Nurture, LLC, et al.
as 3:2024mc80131
Not Yet Classified:
Subpoena to Non-Party Jessica Rolph
Plaintiff:
Margaret Watkins and James D. Watkins
Defendant:
Nurture, LLC, Hain Celestial Group, Inc., Amazon.com Services LLC and others
Su v. Amazon.com Services LLC
as 24-3260
Petitioner:
JULIE A. SU, Acting Secretary of Labor, United States Department of Labor
Respondent:
AMAZON.COM SERVICES LLC
Long v. Amazon.com Services LLC
as 24-3257
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL E. LONG
Defendant:
AMAZON.COM SERVICES LLC
Isom v. Amazon.com
as 2:2024cv00108
Plaintiff:
Tyesha Natalie Isom
Defendant:
Amazon.com
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Jiangxo Zhengao Recycled Textile Co., Ltd. v. Amazon.com Services, LLC et al
as 1:2024cv03434
Petitioner:
Jiangxo Zhengao Recycled Textile Co., Ltd.
Respondent:
Amazon.com Services, LLC and Amazon.com, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 09 U.S.C. § 203 Jurisdiction; amount in controversy
Teri Woods Publishing, LLC v. Amazon.com, Inc.
as 24-1137
Plaintiff:
TERI WOODS PUBLISHING, LLC
Defendant:
AMAZON.COM, INC., AUDIBLE, INC., BLACKSTONE AUDIO, INC. and others
In Re: Request from Germany
as 1:2024cv00493
Petitioner:
Amazon.com, Inc.
Respondent:
Nokia Technologies Oy, Alcatel Lucent SAS, Nokia Corporation and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1782 Letter rogatory - appointment
Daniel Grant v. Amazon.com Services LLC et al
as 2:2024cv03141
Plaintiff:
Daniel Grant
Defendant:
Amazon.com Services LLC and DOES 1 through 10 inclusive
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
NLRB v. Amazon.com Services LLC
as 24-1619
Petitioner:
NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS BOARD
Respondent:
AMAZON.COM SERVICES LLC
Simon Haines v. Amazon.com Services LLC et al
as 2:2024cv00543
Petitioner:
Simon Unsworth Haines
Respondent:
Amazon.com Services LLC and Amazon.com Inc
Cause Of Action: 09 U.S.C. § 0010 Petition to Vacate Arbitration Award
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
