Cases 1 - 10 of 10
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2021cv00069
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Hettinger v. GCI Liberty Broadband, Inc. et al
as 1:2020cv09908
Defendant:
Sue Ann Hamilton, John C. Malone, Gregg L. Engles and others
Plaintiff:
John Hettinger
Emery v. GCI Liberty, Inc. et al
as 1:2020cv09623
Defendant:
Sue Ann Hamilton, John C. Malone, Gregg L. Engles and others
Plaintiff:
Nicholas Emery
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 sv
Baker v. GCI Liberty, Inc. et al
as 1:2020cv01425
Defendant:
Sue Ann Hamilton, John C. Malone, Gregg L. Engles and others
Plaintiff:
Lewis Baker
Estate of Louis Charles Hamilton II et al v. Trump et al
as 1:2020cv00266
Defendant:
United States Congress, Donald John Trump, Sr, United Nations and others
Plaintiff:
Louis Charles Hamilton, II, Emma Watson, Henry Charles Albert David and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961
Mack Lott v. Ralph Kemp, et al
as 15-7087
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Mack Henry Lott
Defendant / Appellee:
Ralph Kemp, Warden, Jerry Sikes, Investigator, Ron Cole, Unit Manager and others
Mack Lott v. Ralph Kemp, et al
as 15-7087
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Mack Henry Lott
Defendant - Appellee:
Ralph Kemp, Warden, Jerry Sikes, Investigator, Ron Cole, Unit Manager and others
LOTT v. KEMP et al
as 1:2015mc00466
Plaintiff:
HENRY LOTT
Defendant:
RALPH KEMP, JERRY SIKES, RON COLE and others
Cause Of Action: Civil Miscellaneous Case
Joe Ann Hamilton, et al v. First American Title Co
as 10-16
Plaintiff - Respondent:
JOE ANN HAMILTON, ERNEST HAMILTON, ALLEAN BROOKS, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated and others
Defendant - Petitioner:
FIRST AMERICAN TITLE CO
Hamilton v. Fresh Concept Restaurant Corporation
as 0:2008cv61209
Plaintiff:
Ann Hamilton
Defendant:
Fresh Concept Restaurant Corporation
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
