Cases 1 - 10 of 4,283
Carter et al v. Coinbase Global, Inc. et al
as 3:2024cv03350
Plaintiff:
Mollijoy Carter, Bradley Barnes and Antonett Foy
Defendant:
Coinbase Global, Inc., Coinbase, Inc., Coinbase Asset Management, LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Securities Fraud
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv00397
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
Privilege Underwriters Reciprocal Exchange v. United Van Lines, LLC et al
as 0:2024cv60855
Plaintiff:
Privilege Underwriters Reciprocal Exchange a/s/o Gary Lifton and Danielle Queller Lifton
Defendant:
United Van Lines, LLC and Armstrong Relocation Florida, LLC
Cause Of Action: 49 U.S.C. § 0081 Damaged Goods While Being Transported
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 8:2024cv01183
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 8:2024cv01182
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
Witt v. Stefonski
as 24-1302
Plaintiff:
WENDY WITT
Defendant:
DARRYL STEFONSKI, c/o Stonington Police Department, RYAN J. ARMSTRONG, Officer, c/o Stonington Police Department, POWELL, Officer, c/o Stonington Police Department and others
Singh Banga v. Kanios, et al.
as 24-2917
Plaintiff:
NAVJEET SINGH BANGA
Defendant:
CHRIS GUS KANIOS, DEAN BARBIERI, ELEANOR ARMSTRONG and others
Arthur ArmstrongIn re: Arthur Armstrong
as 24-8015
Petitioner:
In re: ARTHUR O. ARMSTRONG
Respondent:
COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA and SCHOOL DISTRICT OF PHILADELPHIA
Aceves et al v. Coinbase Global, Inc. et al
as 3:2024cv02663
Plaintiff:
GERARDO ACEVES, Thomas Fan, Edwin Martinez and others
Defendant:
Coinbase Global, Inc., Coinbase, Inc., COINBASE ASSET MANAGEMENT, LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Securities Fraud
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
