Cases 1 - 10 of 618
Sternberg v. Warneck, et al.
as 24-7206
Defendant:
CITY OF SAN JOSE, MAGDALENA LAW GROUP, JEFF DRAHER and others
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL C. STERNBERG
JTRE Manhattan Avenue LLC v. Capital One, N.A.
as 24-2855
:
JTRE MANHATTAN AVENUE LLC, JTRE 807 MANHATTAN AVENUE LLC and CAPITAL ONE, N.A.
Intervenor:
ASH CORPORATE SERVICES, LLC
Stine v. Howard, et al.
as 24-6606
Defendant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Federal Bureau of Prisons, FEDERAL BUREAU OF PRISONS, Agency at USP - Tucson, UNKNOWN TUBBS, Ms. Tubbs, Associate Warden and others
Plaintiff:
MIKEAL GLENN STINE
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv11112
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
Ash, et al. v. Axos Bank
as 24-6277
Defendant:
AXOS BANK
Plaintiff:
KYLE ASH and MOSHE STEMPEL, indvidually and on behalf of all others similarly situated
Stinson v. Nejah, et al.
as 24-6077
Defendant:
ASH TONKA, LUNY L'AO, ALLEN NEJAH and others
Plaintiff:
RONNIE STINSON
ASH v. SECRETARY OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES
as 1:2024vv01556
Respondent:
SECRETARY OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES
Petitioner:
TERRY ASH
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 300 Vaccine Injury Act
George Perez Sr et al v. The 3M Company et al
as SC/2:24-cv-05435
Defendant:
The 3M Company, Minnesota Mining and Manufacturing, Co., AGC Chemicals Americas Inc and others
Plaintiff:
GEORGE PEREZ SR., HENRY ACHEY III, BRYAN ADAMSON and others
Davenell Ash v. Duluth Police Dept., et al
as 24-2841
Defendant:
Duluth Police Department and Minnesota State Patrol
Plaintiff:
Davenell L. Ash
Roche Molecular Systems, Inc. et al v. Foresight Diagnostics Inc. et al
as 3:2024cv06117
Defendant:
Dr. Maximilian Diehn, Dr. Ash Alizadeh and Foresight Diagnostics Inc.
Plaintiff:
Roche Molecular Systems, Inc. and Roche Sequencing Solutions, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1836 (a) - Injunction against Misappropriation of Trade Secrets
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
