Other Statutes Cases
Cases 1 - 10 of 83,797
Medrano Saenz, et al. v. Garland
as 24-3200
Petitioner: YENY ARELY MEDRANO SAENZ and ZACHARY JOSHUA ARGUETA MEDRANO
Respondent: MERRICK B. GARLAND, ATTORNEY GENERAL
Lopez-Sierra v. Garland
as 24-60241
Petitioner: Rene Alejandro Lopez-Sierra
Respondent: Merrick Garland, U.S. Attorney General
Sebastian Nowak v. Merrick B. Garland
as 24-1877
Petitioner: SEBASTIAN NOWAK
Respondent: MERRICK B. GARLAND, Attorney General of the United States
Carroll Independent School District v. United States Department of Education et al
as 4:2024cv00461
Plaintiff: Carroll Independent School District
Defendant: United States Department of Education, Miguel Cardona, in his capacity as Secretary of the United States Department of Education, Catherine E. Lhamon, in her official capacity as Assistant Secretary for Civil Rights at the United States Department of Education and others
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. ยง 551 Administrative Procedure Act
Quintero v. Garland
as 24-3209
Petitioner: YAJAIRA MARGELIA QUINTERO
Respondent: MERRICK B. GARLAND, ATTORNEY GENERAL
Garcia-Ruiz v. Garland
as 24-3217
Petitioner: ALEX ADAN GARCIA-RUIZ
Respondent: MERRICK B. GARLAND, ATTORNEY GENERAL
Guerra-Torres v. Garland
as 24-3207
Petitioner: VILMA YOLANDA GUERRA-TORRES
Respondent: MERRICK B. GARLAND, ATTORNEY GENERAL
Sikder v. Garland
as 24-1362
Petitioner: MOHAMMED LOKMAN SIKDER, FARJANA AKTER, MOHAMMED SAFWAN SIKDER and others
Respondent: MERRICK B. GARLAND, UNITED STATES ATTORNEY GENERAL
Rodriguez-Cecias v. Garland
as 24-1367
Petitioner: DONNY ANDRE RODRIGUEZ-CECIAS, KARLA STEPHANIE MIRANDA-MANRIQUE and EITHAN SEBASTIAN RODRIGUEZ-MIRANDA
Respondent: MERRICK B. GARLAND, UNITED STATES ATTORNEY GENERAL
Hidalgo Sanchez, et al. v. Garland
as 24-3194
Petitioner: YADIRA HIDALGO SANCHEZ and YULISA HIDALGO HIDALGO
Respondent: MERRICK B. GARLAND, ATTORNEY GENERAL

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?