Cases 1 - 10 of 21
Spimerica Access Solutions, LLC v. Palazzani Industrie, S.P.A. et al
as 1:2023cv23222
Plaintiff:
Spimerica Access Solutions, LLC
Defendant:
Palazzani Industrie, S.P.A., Spider Atlantic Corp., Davide Palazzani and others
Bowman et al v. Unibank et al
as 2:2023cv00971
Plaintiff:
Brodie L Bowman, Jack Bryant, Brian Stephan Chu and others
Defendant:
Unibank, U & I Financial Corp., Simon Bai and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1964 Racketeering (RICO) Act
Benjamin Bathen v. Kathleen Allison, et al
as 21-56219
Petitioner / Appellant:
BENJAMIN LEE BATHEN
Respondent / Appellee:
KATHLEEN ALLISON, Secretary, California Department and XAVIER BECERRA
Crawford et al v. Bleeden et al
as 3:2021cv02181
Defendant:
Sean Reza, David Bleeden, Bearhunter, LLC and others
Plaintiff:
Kelly M Crawford
Consolidated Plaintiff:
Peter C Lewis and Charlene C Koonce
Cause Of Action: 12 U.S.C. § 22
US v. Benjamin Parsons
as 20-4128
Defendant / Appellant:
BENJAMIN LEE PARSONS
Plaintiff / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
USA v. Mark Ford
as 18-13047
Plaintiff - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant:
MARK RAYMOND FORD, a.k.a. Dred, a.k.a. Benjamin Lee Green, a.k.a. Donald Wray
In re: Benjamin Taylor v. Karen Good
as 17-60000
Debtor:
In re: BENJAMIN LEE TAYLOR and JANET LOUISE TAYLOR
Appellant:
BENJAMIN LEE TAYLOR
Appellee:
KAREN GOOD, DBA Judgment Enforcement Bureau
USA v. Mark Ford
as 16-17808
Plaintiff - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant:
MARK RAYMOND FORD, a.k.a. Dred, a.k.a. Benjamin Lee Green, a.k.a. Donald Wray
US v. Benjamin Stower
as 16-6661
Plaintiff - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant:
BENJAMIN LEE STOWERS, a/k/a Benji Stowers
USA v. Mark Ford
as 15-12827
Plaintiff - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant:
MARK RAYMOND FORD, a.k.a. Dred, a.k.a. Benjamin Lee Green, a.k.a. Donald Wray
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
