Cases 1 - 10 of 31
NJOY LLC v. iMiracle HK Limited et al
as 2:2023cv08798
Defendant:
American Vape Company LLC, iMiracle HK Limited, Shenzhen iMiracle Technology Co. Ltd and others
Plaintiff:
NJOY LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Tort Action
State of Tennessee et al v. Bottle Buzz, Inc. et al
as 3:2023cv00695
Plaintiff:
State of Tennessee and Jonathan Skrmetti
Defendant:
Bottle Buzz, Inc. doing business as Bottle Buzz, Cask Cartel Distilleries and Distribution doing business as Cask Cartel, The Liquor Bros doing business as The Liquor Bros doing business as Lena's Liquor and others
EIPCa, et al v. Shirley Weber, et al
as 21-56061
Plaintiff / Appellant:
ELECTION INTEGRITY PROJECT CALIFORNIA, INC., JAMES P. BRADLEY, AJA SMITH and others
Defendant / Appellee:
SHIRLEY WEBER, California Secretary of State, ROB BONTA, California Attorney General, GAVIN NEWSOM, Governor of the State of California and others
Kent v. Care.com, Inc. et al
as 1:2020cv00088
Plaintiff:
Michael Kent
Defendant:
Duncan Robertson, Marla Blow, William H. Harris and others
Moriarty et al v. Wynnestone Communities Corporation et al
as 2:2019cv12606
Defendant:
William C Bucher, Eric Van Lustbader, Douglas Allison Trust and others
Plaintiff:
LP Equity 3, LLC, Aubrey Family Trust, Daniel C Bentley and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961
Real Estate Flipz, LLC v. Frozen Food Express, Inc. et al
as 8:2018cv01915
Defendant:
Frozen Food Express, Inc. and FFE Transportation Services, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Real Estate Flipz, LLC and Real Estate Flipz, LLC doing business as Buzz Pop Cocktails
Cause Of Action: 49 U.S.C. § 14706 Liability of Carriers Under Receipts and Bills of Lading
Lloyds Material Supply Company Inc v. Lloyds Equipment Co., Inc. et al
as 2:2017cv05251
Cross Defendant:
Does, Lloyds Equipment, Inc., Lloyds Equipment, Inc. and others
Defendant:
Does, Lloyds Equipment, Inc. and Regal Beloit America, Inc.
Cross Claimant:
Lloyds Equipment, Inc., Lloyds Equipment, Inc., Regal Beloit America, Inc. and others
Plaintiff:
Lloyds Material Supply Company Inc
Kernan v. New York State Department of F
as 16-3643
Plaintiff:
Oriska Corporation and Oriska Insurance Company
Plaintiff - Appellant:
James M. Kernan, individually and on behalf of all those independent entrepreneurs, small and disadvantaged business enterprises, suffering serious, permanent and irreparable economic and social injury and damage as a result of actions by the Defendants t
Defendant - Appellee:
New York State Department of Financial Services, FKA New York State Department of Insurance, Benjamin M. Lawsky, Superintendent of New York State Department of Financial Services, Charles Buzz Sawyer, Assistant Chief Investigator and others
Defendant:
Michael A. Mark, Investigator, Beth Cohen, Esq., Associate Attorney, Edward R. Broton, Assistant United States Attorney and others
Kernan v. New York State Department of F
as 16-3658
Plaintiff:
James M. Kernan, individually and on behalf of all those independent entrepreneurs, small and disadvantaged business enterprises, suffering serious, permanent and irreparable economic and social injury and damage as a result of actions by the Defendants t
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Oriska Corporation and Oriska Insurance Company
Defendant - Appellee:
New York State Department of Financial Services, FKA New York State Department of Insurance, Benjamin M. Lawsky, Superintendent of New York State Department of Financial Services, Charles Buzz Sawyer, Assistant Chief Investigator and others
Defendant:
Michael A. Mark, Investigator, Beth Cohen, Esq., Associate Attorney, Edward R. Broton, Assistant United States Attorney and others
United States of America v. Fernandini
as 16-3257
Appellee USA:
United States of America
Defendant:
Pablo Ivan Santiago, AKA Ivan, Omar Castro Lopez, AKA Sealed Defendant 3, AKA Cache, AKA Pmar Castro Lopez, Mauricio Villareal, AKA Sealed Defendant 4 and others
Defendant - Appellant:
Levit Fernandini, AKA Lev, AKA Scooby Doo, AKA La Flaca
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
