Cases 1 - 10 of 14
Norman Herterich v. Mary Wiss, et al
as 21-16746
Plaintiff / Appellant:
NORMAN BARTSCH HERTERICH
Defendant / Appellee:
MARY E. WISS, ROBERT L. DONDERO, SANDRA L. MARGULIES and others
NPF Franchising, LLC v. Sy Dawgs, LLC, et al
as 21-3516
Interested Party:
KATHRYN B. FOX, TRACY A. WARREN, J. PATRICK ALLEN and others
Defendant / Appellee:
CONNIE A. MAY, KTC INTERESTS, LLC, SCRAP YARD FAST PITCH, LLC and others
Plaintiff:
NPF FRANCHISING, LLC
Norman Herterich v. Ernest Goldsmith, et al
as 20-17197
Defendant / Appellee:
ROBERT L. DONDERO, MING WILLIAM CHIN, KATHLEEN BANKE and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
NORMAN HERTERICH and NORMAN BARTSCH HERTERICH
Norman Herterich v. City & County of San Francisco, et al
as 20-16286
Defendant / Appellee:
GORDON PARK-LI, MARY E. WISS, CITY AND COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
NORMAN BARTSCH HERTERICH and NORMAN HERTERICH
Daniel Sarauer, et al v. International Association of M, et al
as 19-3142
Defendant / Appellee:
MAYSTEEL INDUSTRIES LLC, ALLENTOWN FACILITY, INTERNATIONAL ASSOCIATION OF MACHINIST AND AEROSPACE WORKERS DISTRICT NO. 10 and INTERNATIONAL ASSOCIATION OF MACHINIST AND AEROSPACE WORKERS ROCK RIVER LODGE 2053
Plaintiff / Appellant:
DARYL BARTSCH, RANDOLPH KUBATZKI, DANIEL SARAUER and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 0:2014cv01243
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 0:2014cv00961
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
BARTSCH v. SECRETARY OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES
as 1:2013vv00536
Petitioner:
BRIDGET BARTSCH
Respondent:
SECRETARY OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 300
Type:
Other Statutes
Murla v. Foote et al
as 1:2012cv01633
Plaintiff:
Sean Murla
Defendant:
Gregory E. Foote, Ashley Bartsch , Kellie C. Brady and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 77
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
