Cases 1 - 10 of 22
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2022mc00010
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
unknown v. unknown
as 1:2021cv05135
Plaintiff:
Ifran Bhagat and IOU Central Inc.d/b/a IOU Financial Inc.
Defendant:
Mid-West Oil Inc. and Mohammad Ahmed
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Murphree et al v. Apple Inc
as 2:2021cv00978
Plaintiff:
Donna Murphree, Rob Wright, Rachel Roberts and others
Defendant:
Apple Inc
ZEVA v. EBANG INTERNATIONAL HOLDINGS INC. et al
as 2:2021cv09859
Defendant:
EBANG INTERNATIONAL HOLDINGS INC., LEI CHEN and DONG HU
Plaintiff:
KONSTANTIN ZEVA and Brijesh Bhagat
Petitioner:
RONALD ANTOSKO, Elad Rachevsky, XIANDE YANG and others
Zaker v. Ebang International Holdings Inc. et al
as 1:2021cv03060
Defendant:
Ebang International Holdings Inc., Lei Chen and Dong Hu
Plaintiff:
Tommie Zaker
Lead Plaintiff:
Dr. Gowrisankar Naidu Galla
Petitioner:
GALLA Investments Inc., Yan Yuan, Brijesh Bhagat and others
City of Los Angeles AIHM Hotel, et al v. City of Los Angeles, et al
as 19-56399
Plaintiff / Appellant:
SUMANTRAI R. AHIR, NIMESH PATEL, MAYUR B. PATEL and others
Defendant / Appellee:
CITY OF LOS ANGELES, a municipal corporation and DOES, 1 through 10 inclusive
City of Los Angeles AIHM Hotel Motel Association et al City of Los Angeles
as 2:2018mc00022
Plaintiff:
108 Motel, Pravin Ahir, Sumantrai R. Ahir and others
Defendant:
City of Los Angeles and Does
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2017cv01139
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681
Pratyush Bhagat v. Attorney General United State
as 16-2205
Petitioner:
PRATYUSH BHAGAT
Respondent:
ATTORNEY GENERAL UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
BHAGAT et al v. JOHNSON et al
as 1:2015cv00947
Plaintiff:
SANGEETA BHAGAT and PRIYAM BHAGAT
Defendant:
JEH CHARLES JOHNSON , LORETTA LYNCH , LEON RODRIGUEZ and others
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 551
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
