Cases 1 - 10 of 20
USA v. Calvin Freeman
as 21-2907
Plaintiff / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant / Appellant:
CALVIN C. FREEMAN
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2021cv01009
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2021cv01008
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Datta v. DEA Agents
as 21-1960
Petitioner:
Vikram Datta
Respondent:
DEA Agents, IRS Agents, Magistrate Judges and others
James Williams v. Craig Koenig, et al
as 21-16092
Defendant / Appellee:
NGUYEN, First name unknown; Primary Care Provider CTF, K.J. ALLEN, Appeal Examiner Headquarters, K. HOFFMAN, Associate Deputy Warden CTF and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
JAMES WILLIAMS
James Williams v. Craig Koenig, et al
as 21-15983
Defendant / Appellee:
NGUYEN, First name unknown; Primary Care Provider CTF, K.J. ALLEN, Appeal Examiner Headquarters, K. HOFFMAN, Associate Deputy Warden CTF and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
JAMES WILLIAMS
James Williams v. Craig Koenig, et al
as 21-15278
Defendant / Appellee:
NGUYEN, First name unknown; Primary Care Provider CTF, K.J. ALLEN, Appeal Examiner Headquarters, K. HOFFMAN, Associate Deputy Warden CTF and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
JAMES WILLIAMS
Mack West, Jr. v. F. Ulloa, et al
as 20-56167
Defendant / Appellee:
J. CURIEL, Appeal Coordinator, individual and official capacity, T. GARRETT, Psychologist, official capacity, B. MARTIN, Correctional Officer, individual and official capacity and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
MACK A. WEST, Jr.
Walter Goodson v. Perez-Pantoja, et al
as 20-16468
Defendant:
C. FREEMAN, Captain at CTF-Central, SANTIAGO, Associate Warden, K. Z. ALLEN, Appeals Examiner and others
Defendant / Appellee:
PEREZ-PANTOJA, Correctional Officer
Plaintiff / Appellant:
WALTER CREG GOODSON
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
