Cases 1 - 8 of 8
Daryl Whitaker v. Ciena Corporation
as 21-1120
Defendant / Appellee:
CIENA CORPORATION
Plaintiff / Appellant:
DARYL WHITAKER
Ciena Corporation v. Oyster Optics, LLC
as 19-2117
Appellee:
OYSTER OPTICS, LLC
Appellant:
CIENA CORPORATION
William Parker v. Ciena Corporation
as 19-1144
Defendant / Appellee:
CIENA CORPORATION and MARK GORMAN
Plaintiff / Appellant:
WILLIAM PARKER
In re: Ciena Corporation
as 1:2014mc00013
Movant:
AT&T Corp. and SBC Internet Services Inc.
Respondent:
Ciena Corporation
Cause Of Action: Motion to Compel
Bd Trst of Leland, et al v. Corning Inc, et al
as 2:2000cv10584
Counter Claimant:
Agere Systems Inc, Ciena Corporation, Ericson Microelectronics AB, Optoelectronic Products and others
Unknown:
Steven D Chin, Steven D Chin, David M Kleiman and others
Defendant:
Agere Systems Inc, Alcatel S A, Alcatel USA and others
Counter Defendant:
Board of Trustees of the Leland Stanford Junior University, Board of Trustees of the Leland Stanford Junior University, Board of Trustees of the Leland Stanford Junior University and others
Plaintiff:
Board of Trustees of the Leland Stanford Junior University and Litton Systems Inc
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. ยง 1126 Patent Infringement
Covad Comm Co, et al v. FCC, et al
as 05-1095
Petitioner:
Covad Communications Company and Dieca Communications, Inc., doing business as Covad Communications Company
Respondent:
Federal Communications Commission and United States of America
Terminated Party:
AT&T Corporation, ATX Licensing, Inc., Curry Communications, Inc. and others
Intervenor:
Ciena Corporation, Time Warner Telecom, Inc., Promoting Active Competition Everywhere Coalition and others
Intervenor For Petitioner:
Line Systems, Inc. and ATX Communications, Inc.
CIENA CORP V CORVIS CORP
as 05-1245
Plaintiff-Appellee:
CIENA CORPORATION and CIENA PROPERTIES, INC.
Defendant-Appellant:
CORVIS CORPORATION
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
