Cases 1 - 10 of 74
Garuda Labs, Inc. et al v. City and County of Denver, Colorado et al
as 1:2024cv01940
Plaintiff:
ADVANTAGE WORKFORCE SERVICES, LLC and Garuda Labs, Inc. a Delaware corporation doing business as Instawork
Defendant:
Denver Auditor's Office and City and County of Denver, Colorado
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201 Constitutionality of State Statute(s)
Restaurant Law Center et al v. City and County of Denver, The
as 1:2024cv01862
Plaintiff:
National Apartment Association, Restaurant Law Center, American Hotel & Lodging Association and others
Defendant:
City and County of Denver, The
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 6201 - Energy Policy & Conservation Act (Statement of Purpose)
Miller et al v. City and County of Denver
as 1:2024cv01592
Plaintiff:
Penthouse Enterprise, LLC and Antonio Miller
Defendant:
City and County of Denver
Cause Of Action: 50 U.S.C. § 0501 : Soldiers and Sailors Civil Relief Act of 1940
Colorado Apartment Association et al v. Ryan et al
as 1:2024cv01093
Plaintiff:
Colorado Apartment Association, Inc., Apartment Association of Metro Denver, Colorado Hotel and Lodging Association, Inc., and others
Defendant:
Jill Hunsaker Ryan, Michael Ogletree, Executive Director Will Toor and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 6201 - Energy Policy & Conservation Act (Statement of Purpose)
City and County of Denver v. Jarman, et al
as 24-702
Petitioner:
CITY AND COUNTY OF DENVER
Respondent:
PAUL JARMAN and THOMAS MELENDEZ, individually and on behalf of all other similarly situated persons
Westmoreland Mining Holdings L v. EPA, et al
as 19-1176
Petitioner:
Westmoreland Mining Holdings LLC
Respondent:
Andrew Wheeler, Administrator of the United States Environmental Protection Agency, Environmental Protection Agency and Jane Nishida, Acting Administrator of the United States Environmental Protection Agency
Amicus Curiae:
City of Portland, Debra A. Haaland, Michael Oppenheimer and others
Intervenor:
Commonwealth of Virginia, Center for Biological Diversity, City of Boulder and others
Regents of University of California et al v. United States Department of Homeland Security et al
as 3:2017cv05211
Defendant:
United States Department of Homeland Security, Elaine Duke, Former Federal Immigration and Homeland Security Officials and others
Plaintiff:
Regents of University of California, Janet Napolitano and UC Regents
Petitioner:
City of Seattle, U.S. Conference of Mayors, City of West Hollywood and others
Amicus Curiae:
Services, Immigrant Rights, and Education Network, West Contra Costa Unified School District, Legal Aid Society of San Mateo County and others
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 551 Administrative Procedure Act
City and County of San Francisco et al v. U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services et al
as 4:2019cv04717
Plaintiff:
City and County of San Francisco and County of Santa Clara
Defendant:
Acting Secretary of Kevin McAleenen, Department of Homeland Security, Acting Director Kenneth T. Cuccinelli and others
Petitioner:
Community Healthcare Network, Presidents' Alliance on Higher Education and Immigration, America's Essential Hospitals and others
Amicus Curiae:
The Cities of Los Angeles and Oakland, California; Harris County, Texas; and 26 Additional Cities, Counties, and Local Government Agencies, City of Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, City of Seattle, Washington and others
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 551 Administrative Procedure Act
AZ, et al v. Joseph Biden, et al
as 22-3272
Plaintiff / Appellee:
STATE OF ARIZONA, STATE OF MONTANA and STATE OF OHIO
Defendant / Appellant:
JOSEPH R. BIDEN, in his official capacity as President of the United States, U.S. DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY, UNITED STATES OF AMERICA and others
Amicus Curiae:
COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES, CA, CITY OF ALBUQUERQUE, NM, CITY OF BOSTON, MA and others
Valdez v. Motyka, et al
as 21-1415
Plaintiff / Appellant:
MICHAEL VALDEZ
Defendant / Appellee:
ROBERT MOTYKA, JR., Denver Police Officer, in his individual capacity, CITY AND COUNTY OF DENVER, a municipality and JOHN MCDONALD, a Denver Police Officer, in his individual capacity
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
