Cases 1 - 5 of 5
Buncombe County, North Carolina et al v. HCA Healthcare, Inc. et al
as 1:2022cv00147
Defendant:
ANC Healthcare, Inc., HCA Healthcare, Inc., HCA Management Services, LP and others
Plaintiff:
Buncombe County, North Carolina and City of Asheville, North Carolina
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1 Antitrust Litigation
City of Brevard, North Carolina v. HCA Healthcare, Inc. et al
as 1:2022cv00114
Defendant:
ANC Healthcare, Inc., HCA Healthcare, Inc., HCA Management Services, LP and others
Plaintiff:
City of Brevard, North Carolina and Madison County
Consolidated Plaintiff:
Buncombe County, North Carolina and City of Asheville, North Carolina
Interested Party:
State of NC
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1 Antitrust Litigation
Devon Gayles v. State of North Carolina Inc.
as 20-7842
Defendant / Appellee:
GARY G. HOSBEIN, Esquire, DENNIS M. WILEY, Magistrate, WARREN G. CLARK, District Executive and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
DEVON ARMOND GAYLES, a/k/a Devon A. Gayles El, In propria persona, proceeding sui juris, Moorish American National All Rights Reserved Ex rel
Westmoreland Mining Holdings L v. EPA, et al
as 19-1176
Petitioner:
Westmoreland Mining Holdings LLC
Respondent:
Andrew Wheeler, Administrator of the United States Environmental Protection Agency, Environmental Protection Agency and Jane Nishida, Acting Administrator of the United States Environmental Protection Agency
Amicus Curiae:
City of Portland, Debra A. Haaland, Michael Oppenheimer and others
Intervenor:
Commonwealth of Virginia, Center for Biological Diversity, City of Boulder and others
Biogenic CO2 Coalition v. EPA, et al
as 19-1185
Respondent:
Andrew Wheeler and Environmental Protection Agency
Petitioner:
Biogenic CO2 Coalition
Amicus Curiae:
City of Portland, Debra A. Haaland, Michael Oppenheimer and others
Intervenor:
Center for Biological Diversity, Clean Air Council, Natural Resources Defense Council and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
