Other Statutes Cases
Laney Harris v. City of Texarkana, Arkansas, et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 19-3499
Defendant / Appellee: Terri Kenner Peavy, Individually and in her official capacities, Penny Ruth-Bell, Mayor of the City of Texarkana, Arkansas, Individually and in her official capacities, City of Texarkana, Arkansas, A Public Body Corporate and others
Plaintiff / Appellant: Laney Harris
CENTRAL ARKANSAS WATER et al v. KEMIRA CHEMICALS, INC. et al
as 2:2017cv05974
Plaintiff: CENTRAL ARKANSAS WATER , CITY OF CHARLOTTE, NORTH CAROLINA , CITY AND COUNTY OF DENVER, COLORADO and others
Defendant: KEMIRA CHEMICALS, INC. and KENNETH A. GHAZEY
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1
LIQUID ALUMINUM SULFATE ANTITRUST LITIGATION
as 2:2016md02687
Plaintiff: Rivanna Water & Sewer Authority, CITY OF FERGUS FALLS, MINNESOTA, INTERSTATE CHEMICAL CO., INC. and others
Defendant: VINCENT J. OPALEWSKI, SOUTHERN IONICS, INC., C&S CHEMICALS (OF GEORGIA) INC. and others
Intervenor: US Department of Justice and Lawrence McShane
Special Master: DENNIS M. CAVANAUGH and JUDGE FAITH S. HOCHBERG
In Re: LIQUID ALUMINUM SULFATE ANTITRUST LITIGATION
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1
THE CITY OF TEXARKANA, ARKANSAS et al v. REICHL et al
as NJ/2:15-cv-08294
Plaintiff: THE CITY OF TEXARKANA, ARKANSAS and THE CITY OF TEXARKANA, TEXAS
Defendant: FRANK A. REICHL , GENERAL CHEMICAL PERFORMANCE PRODUCTS LLC , GENERAL CHEMICAL CORPORATION and others
THE CITY OF TEXARKANA, ARKANSAS et al v. REICHL et al
as 2:2015cv08294
Plaintiff: THE CITY OF TEXARKANA, ARKANSAS and THE CITY OF TEXARKANA, TEXAS
Defendant: FRANK A. REICHL , GENERAL CHEMICAL PERFORMANCE PRODUCTS LLC , GENERAL CHEMICAL CORPORATION and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1
Green v. City of Texarkana Arkansas et al
as 4:2007mc00441
Plaintiff: Bobbie Green
Defendant: City of Texarkana Arkansas and Todd Harness

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?