Cases 1 - 10 of 227
TBL Lic LLC f/k/a Timberland Co & Subsidiaries v. Charles Rettig
as 22-1783
Petitioner / Appellant:
TBL LICENSING LLC, f/k/a Timberland Company, , and subsidiaries (a consolidated group)
Respondent / Appellee:
CHARLES P. RETTIG, Commissioner of Internal Revenue Service
Abdolrahim v. Rettig
as 22-1403
Petitioner / Appellant:
NITKA FATEMEH ABDOLRAHIM
Respondent / Appellee:
CHARLES P. RETTIG, Commissioner of Internal Revenue Service
Collins v. Rettig
as 22-1404
Petitioner / Appellant:
MELVIN COLLINS
Respondent / Appellee:
CHARLES P. RETTIG, Commissioner of Internal Revenue Service
Stone et al v. Internal Revenue Service Commissioner
as 9:2022cv80154
Plaintiff:
David E Stone, Kari S Carroll and David C Depadro
Defendant:
Internal Revenue Service Commissioner and Commissioner of Internal Revenue Service
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. ยง 0551 Administrative Procedure Act
Warrenton London, Sr. v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue Service
as 22-1077
Petitioner / Appellant:
WARRENTON S. LONDON, SR. and CARLENE C. LONDON
Respondent / Appellee:
COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE SERVICE
Donnie Scott v. Janet Yellen, et al
as 21-15750
Defendant / Appellee:
JANET YELLEN, Secretary of the U.S. Department of Treasury and CHARLES P. RETTIG, U.S. Commissioner of Internal Revenue Service
Plaintiff / Appellant:
DONNIE SCOTT
Louis Shuman v. IRS
as 21-1070
Petitioner / Appellant:
SANDRA SHUMAN and LOUIS S. SHUMAN
Respondent / Appellee:
COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE SERVICE
Winfred Nicholson v. Commissioner of IRS
as 20-2002
Respondent / Appellee:
COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE SERVICE
Petitioner / Appellant:
WINFRED F. NICHOLSON
Pengcheng Si v. IRS
as 20-1516
Petitioner / Appellant:
PENGCHENG SI
Respondent / Appellee:
COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE SERVICE
Bi Zhang v. IRS
as 20-1453
Petitioner / Appellant:
BI JIAN ZHANG
Respondent / Appellee:
COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE SERVICE
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
