Cases 1 - 7 of 7
Trout, et al. v. County of Madera, et al.
as 24-2956
Plaintiff:
KEITH TROUT, guardian ad litem of minor DA; minor JG1; minor JG2; and minor JG3 and ESTATE OF CALLEY JEAN GARAY, by and through her successor in interest, Keith Trout
Defendant:
COUNTY OF MADERA, COMMUNITY ACTION PARTNERSHIP OF MADERA COUNTY, INC., CAMARENA HEALTH and others
San Luis Obispo County Homeless Union, et al. v. County of San Luis Obispo, et al.
as 24-2575
Plaintiff:
SAN LUIS OBISPO COUNTY HOMELESS UNION, a local affiliate of the California Homeless Union, on behalf of itself, its members and current and former residents of Oklahoma Parking Site, DAVID RICHFORD, DAN RICHFORD and others
Defendant:
COUNTY OF SAN LUIS OBISPO, COUNTY OF SAN LUIS OBISPO DEPARTMENT OF SOCIAL SERVICES DIVISION, DEVIN DRAKE, in his official capacity as Director of Social Services and others
Richard Otto Hansen v. Jana Chase
as 20-1868
Defendant / Appellee:
Jana M. Chase, in her individual capacity, and in her official capacity as a Community Services Coordinator of Community Action Partnership of Mid-Nebraska
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Richard Otto Hansen
Pullum v. Southeast Alabama Community Action Partnership, Inc. (CONSENT)
as 1:2018cv00750
Plaintiff:
Angel Pullum
Defendant:
Southeast Alabama Community Action Partnership, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 41 U.S.C. § 4712
Nelson v. Community Action Partnership of Madera County, Inc.
as 1:2014at00952
Plaintiff:
Fanta Nelson
Defendant:
Community Action Partnership of Madera County, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Nelson v. Community Action Partnership of Madera County, Inc.
as 1:2014cv02064
Plaintiff:
Fanta Nelson
Defendant:
Community Action Partnership of Madera County, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Harris v. Community Action Partnership North Alabama
as 6:2012mc03917
Plaintiff:
Robin Harris
Defendant:
Community Action Partnership North Alabama
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
