Cases 1 - 10 of 1,141
United States of America v. Calhoun
as 6:2024cv03147
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Defendant:
Cortez Calhoun
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 4246 Petition to Determine Present Mental Condition of Imprisoned Person
Cortez-Diaz v. Garland
as 24-2987
Petitioner:
DORA BEATRIZ CORTEZ-DIAZ
Respondent:
MERRICK B. GARLAND, ATTORNEY GENERAL
Lopez-Cortez v. United States District Court for the Eastern District of California, Sacramento
as 24-2889
Petitioner:
RAUL LOPEZ-CORTEZ
Respondent:
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA, SACRAMENTO
Interested Party:
S. SALMONSON, WARDEN
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv03420
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
Juan Ordonez-Castro, et al v. Merrick Garland
as 24-3359
Petitioner:
JUAN ORDONEZ-CASTRO and LUCAS CORTEZ-LOPEZ
Respondent:
MERRICK B. GARLAND, U.S. Attorney General
Cortez v. Stubbs, et al.
as 24-2714
Plaintiff:
MOISES JOSUE CORTEZ
Defendant:
BRANDON STUBBS, FAC ECF No. 33, JOSE GUZMAN, FAC ECF No. 33, MATTHEW ROMAN and others
Joe Hand Promotions, Inc. v. Buster's Bar and Grill LLC et al
as 1:2024cv00424
Plaintiff:
Joe Hand Promotions, Inc.
Defendant:
Buster's Bar and Grill LLC doing business as Buster's Bar and Grill doing business as Buster's and Darius Cortez Buster
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 0605 Unauthorized Publication and Use of Communication
Isaac Carranza-Cortez, et al v. Attorney General United States of America
as 24-1724
Petitioner:
ISAAC DE JESUS CARRANZA-CORTEZ, ZULMA ELIZABETH QUINTEROS-DE CARRANZA and E. M. C.-Q.
Respondent:
ATTORNEY GENERAL UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Hundal v. Islas, et al.
as 24-2303
Plaintiff:
GURKIRN HUNDAL
Defendant:
RUBEN ISLAS, JR., MARTHA ISLAS ENRIQUEZ, JOE ZUNIGA and others
United States of America v. Morales-Cortez
as 24-2193
Plaintiff:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant:
RODOLFO MORALES-CORTEZ
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
