Cases 1 - 7 of 7
Rover Pipeline LLC v. Rover Tract No. PA WA HL-004.5, et al
as 19-1613
Defendant / Appellee:
JAMES M. BUCHANAN AND DIANE ZACK BUCHANAN FARM #4 LP, and, PEOPLES NATURAL GAS CO, c/o Corporation Service Company, GRETCHEN RHEINLANDER, husband and wife and others
Defendant:
FRED C. STROUD, BARBARA MINGES SHEPERD, PNC MORTGAGE, a division of PNC Bank, Nation Association and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
ROVER PIPELINE LLC
Enrique D. Medina v. Raymond Madden
as 2:2016cv06640
Respondent:
Raymond Madden
Petitioner:
Enrique D. Medina
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
G&P Warehouse, Inc. v. A&N Food Enterprises Inc. et al
as 1:2017cv02847
Plaintiff:
G&P Warehouse, Inc.
Defendant:
A&N Food Enterprises Inc., Brook's Ave Food Advantage Corp., N&A Produce & Grocery Corp. and others
Cause Of Action: 07 U.S.C. § 499
Medina v. Commonwealth of Massachusetts et al
as 4:2013cv40120
Plaintiff:
Luis D. Medina
Defendant:
Commonwealth of Massachusetts, Britain and the United States Bay State Access, City of Worcester and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
Samuel Anderson v. USDC-SAC
as 13-72893
:
In re: SAMUEL ANDERSON
Petitioner:
SAMUEL ANDERSON
Respondent:
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA, SACRAMENTO
Real Party In Interest:
J. CLARK KELSO, Receiver, T. KIMURA-YIP, Associate Director, California Prison Health Care, J. WALKER, Chief, Office of Third Level Appeals - Health Care and others
Samuel Anderson v. USDC-SAC
as 13-71813
:
In re: SAMUEL ANDERSON
Petitioner:
SAMUEL ANDERSON
Respondent:
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA, SACRAMENTO
Real Party In Interest:
J. CLARK KELSO, Receiver, T. KIMURA-YIP, Associate Director, California Prison Health Care, J. WALKER, Chief, Office of Third Level Appeals - Health Care and others
Samuel Medina-Medina v. Eric Holder, Jr.
as 10-2138
Petitioner:
SAMUEL D. MEDINA-MEDINA
Respondent:
ERIC H. HOLDER, JR., Attorney General of the United States
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
