Other Statutes Cases
Cases 1 - 10 of 27
Government Employees Insurance Co. et al v. Cutler, D.P.M. et al
as 1:2023cv23537
Plaintiff: Government Employees Insurance Co., GEICO Indemnity Co., GEICO General Insurance Company and others
Defendant: Jonathan Cutler, D.P.M., Central Palm Beach Surgery Center LTD, Spine and Orthopaedic Specialists of Central Florida, LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961 Racketeering (RICO) Act
SurgCenter of Greenbelt, LLC et al v. Surgical Center Development #3, LLC
as 1:2023cv01626
Petitioner: SurgCenter of Greenbelt, LLC, Reza Ghorbani, M.D., Ricardo Pyfrom, M.D., P.A. and others
Respondent: Surgical Center Development #3, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Notice of Removal
Shandhini Raidoo, et al v. Leevin Camacho, et al
as 21-16559
Plaintiff / Appellee: SHANDHINI RAIDOO, M.D., M.P.H. and BLISS KANESHIRO, M.D., M.P.H., on behalf of themselves and their patients
Defendant / Appellant: LEEVIN TAITANO CAMACHO, Leevin Taitano Camacho in his official capacity as Attorney General of Guam, NATHANIEL BERG, M.D., in his official capacity as Chair of the Guam Board of Medical Examiners, PHILIP FLORES, in his official capacity as Vice-Chair of the Guam Board of Medical Examiners and others
Little Rock Fam Planning Svcs, et al v. Larry Jegley, et al
as 21-2857
Plaintiff / Appellee: Little Rock Family Planning Services, on behalf of itself and its patients, Planned Parenthood of Arkansas & Eastern Oklahoma, on behalf of itself and its patients, doing business as Planned Parenthood Great Plains and Janet R. Cathey, M.D. on behalf of herself and her patients
Defendant / Appellant: Larry Jegley, in his official capacity as Prosecuting Attorney of Pulaski County, Sylvia D. Simon, M.D. in her official capacity as Chairman of the Arkansas State Medical Board, Robert Breving, M.D., in his official capacity as officer/member of the Arkansas State Medical Board and others
U.S. FOOT AND ANKLE SPECIALISTS, LLC v. GOTTLIEB
as 8:2021cv01831
Plaintiff: U.S. FOOT AND ANKLE SPECIALISTS, LLC
Defendant: D.P.M. IRA J. GOTTLIEB
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201
Ali El-Khalil v. Nsima Usen, et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 21-1140
Plaintiff / Appellant: ALI EL-KHALIL, D.P.M.
Defendant / Appellee: DETROIT MEDICAL CENTER, a Domestic Not for Profit Corporation, NSIMA USEN and MOHAMMED KHALIL
Frederick Hopkins, et al v. Larry Jegley, et al
as 21-1068
Defendant / Appellant: Carl Riddell, M.D., Officer and member of the Arkansas Department of Health, Dwayne Daniels, M.D., Officer and member of the Arkansas Department of Health, Brian T. Hyatt, M.D., Officer and Member of the State Medical Board and others
Defendant: Bob Cogburn, M.D., officer and member of the Arkansas State Medical Board, and successors in office, in his official capacity, John B. Weiss, M.D., officer and member of the Arkansas State Medical Board, and successors in office, in his official capacity, Steven L. Cathey, M.D., Chair of the Arkansas State Medical Board and others
Plaintiff / Appellee: Little Rock Family Planning Services, Inc. and Frederick W. Hopkins, M.D., M.P.H.
Appellant: State of Kentucky, State of Alabama, State of Arizona and others
Government Employees Insurance Company et al v. Reliable CPM Surgical Supply, Inc. et al
as 1:2020cv05475
Defendant: Laxmidhar Diwan, M.D., Laxmi Diwan, Reliable CPM Surgical Supply, Inc. and others
Plaintiff: Geico Indemnity Company, GEICO Casualty Company, GEICO General Insurance Company and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1962 Racketeering (RICO) Act
Ali El-Khalil v. Anthony Tedeschi, et al
as 20-1422
Defendant / Appellee: MUHMOD ZAMLUT, NSIMA USEN, MOHAMMED KHALIL and others
Plaintiff / Appellant: ALI EL-KHALIL, D.P.M.
Defendant: ANTHONY TEDESCHI
Lane v. Azar et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2019cv03183
Plaintiff: D.P.M. Craig R. Lane and Craig R. Lane
Defendant: Alex M Azar, II, JOANNE CHIEDI and Alex Azar
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 0701

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?