Cases 1 - 9 of 9
Mithril II L.P. et al v. ColubrisMX, Inc. et al
as 1:2022cv00194
Plaintiff:
Mithril II L.P., Lux Ventures VI, L.P. and Lux Ventures VI Sidecar, L.P.
Defendant:
ColubrisMX, Inc., Crescent Healthcare, LLC, Daniel Kim and others
Daniel Kim v. Sheraton Operating Corporation, et al
as 2:2017cv09247
Defendant:
Does, Sheraton Operating Corporation and Unite Here Local 11
Plaintiff:
Daniel Kim
Kim v. Kimm
as 16-3115
Plaintiff - Appellee:
Daniel Kim
Defendant:
Michael-Hyun W. Lee and Hyung Suk Choi, AKA Stephen Choi
Defendant - Appellant:
Michael S. Kimm, doing business as Kimm Law Firm, DBA Kimm Law Firm, Chul Ho Park, AKA Charlie Park, Jin Young Chung, AKA Jamie Chung and others
Kim v. Kimm
as 16-2944
Plaintiff - Appellant-Cross-Appellee:
Daniel Kim
Defendant - Appellee:
Michael-Hyun W. Lee
Defendant - Appellee-Cross-Appellant:
Michael S. Kimm, doing business as Kimm Law Firm, DBA Kimm Law Firm, Chul Ho Park, AKA Charlie Park, Jin Young Chung, AKA Jamie Chung and others
Defendant:
Hyung Suk Choi, AKA Stephen Choi
McLeod et al v. Valve Corporation et al
as 2:2016cv01227
Defendant:
Valve Corporation, Thomas Cassell, James Varga and others
Plaintiff:
McLeod, Samuel Joines, Sam Keller and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1962
Kim v. Kimm et al
as 1:2015cv04784
Defendant:
Charlie and You, Inc., Hyung Suk Choi, Jin Young Chung and others
Plaintiff:
Daniel Kim
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1962 Racketeering (RICO) Act
Sik Gaek, Incorporated v. Marcus Harris, et al
as 14-1196
Plaintiff - Appellant:
SIK GAEK, INCORPORATED
Defendant - Appellee:
MARCUS HARRIS, DANIEL KIM and YOGI'S II, INCORPORATED
Sik Gaek, Inc. v. Kim et al
as 1:2013cv06624
Plaintiff:
Sik Gaek, Inc.
Defendant:
Daniel Kim and Yogi's II, Inc.
Cause Of Action: Civil Miscellaneous Case
Type:
Other Statutes
Joe Hand Promotions, Inc. v. Kim et al
as 1:2010cv06693
Plaintiff:
Joe Hand Promotions, Inc.
Defendant:
David Y Kim, Daniel Kim and G. Zone, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
