Cases 1 - 9 of 9
MALDONADO JR v. Zoley et al
as 9:2022cv81310
Plaintiff:
GERARDO MALDONADO JR
Defendant:
George C. Zoley, Brian R. Evans, Anne N Foreman and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 0078 Securities Exchange Act
Zhang v. Zoley et al
as 9:2021cv82061
Plaintiff:
Rui Zhang
Defendant:
George C. Zoley, Brian R. Evans, Anne N Foreman and others
Cause Of Action: 12 U.S.C. § 0022 Securities Fraud
Logan et al v. Tillerson et al
as 2:2017cv12712
Plaintiff:
Michelle Lynn Logan, Jameel Al Qashtari, Lina Al Qashtari and others
Defendant:
Rex W. Tillerson, U.S. Department of State, Elaine Duke and others
BEGUM et al v. JACOBS et al
as 2:2012cv06343
Plaintiff:
MORTUZA BEGUM , MOHAMMAD YOUSUF and MYRNA YOUSUF
Defendant:
JANICE JACOBS, DAVID DONAHUE, BRIAN J. FOUSS and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Bianca Udugampola, et al v. Janice Jacobs, et al
as 11-5215
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Bianca P. Udugampola, Premadasa Udugampola and Somie Udugampola
Defendant - Appellee:
Janice Jacobs, Assistant Secretary for Consular Affairs, David Donahue, Deputy Assistant Secretary for Visa Services and Christopher R. Green, Consul General U.S. Embassy
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2010cv00285
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702
UDUGAMPOLA et al v. JACOBS et al
as 1:2009cv01321
Plaintiff:
BIANCA P. UDUGAMPOLA and PREMADASA UDUGAMPOLA
Defendant:
JANICE JACOBS, DAVID DONAHUE and CHRISTOPHER R. GREEN
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
In re: Ardeth Finley, Jr.
as 09-5510
Movant:
In re: ARDETH C. FINLEY, JR.
Respondent:
J. DAVID DONAHUE, Warden
TRUAX v. THE STATE OF INDIANA et al
as 1:2008cv01011
Plaintiff:
DALE A. TRUAX
Defendant:
THE STATE OF INDIANA, MITCHELL E. DANIELS, JR., THE INDIANA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
