Cases 1 - 10 of 16
David Bachman v. Darin Young
as 21-1495
Respondent:
Darin Young, Warden of the South Dakota State Penitentiary
Petitioner:
David Jerome Bachman
Philip Astrauskas, Sr., et al v. City of Collinsville, et al
as 20-3064
Defendant / Appellee:
DANIEL DAVIS, DONNA GREEN, CITY OF COLLINSVILLE, a Municipal Corporation and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
PHILIP ASTRAUSKAS, JR., MARY ASTRAUSKAS and PHILIP ASTRAUSKAS, SR.
USA v. David Frank
as 15-30821
Plaintiff - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant:
DAVID JEROME FRANK
Sconyers v. Janssen Research & Development, LLC et al
as FLM/8:15-cv-00239
Plaintiff:
David Jerome Sconyers
Defendant:
Janssen Research & Development, LLC , Janssen Ortho LLC , Janssen Pharmaceuticals, Inc. and others
Gefke v. Commonwealth of Massachusett
as 14-8019
Petitioner:
DAVID JEROME GEFKE
Respondent:
COMMONWEALTH OF MASSACHUSETTS
In re: David Parker
as 14-11063
Petitioner:
In re: DAVID JEROME PARKER
Successive Habeas Respondent:
ATTORNEY GENERAL, STATE OF ALABAMA
In re: David Parker
as 13-13229
Petitioner:
In re: DAVID JEROME PARKER
Successive Habeas Respondent:
ATTORNEY GENERAL, STATE OF ALABAMA
Franklin Reaves, et al v. Black Farmers Assoc. Settle, et al
as 12-5313
Plaintiff - Appellee:
Franklin C. Reaves, Roger Arnold, Cassandra Graham and others
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Sarah Simon-Arnold, Reverend
Defendant - Appellee:
Black Farmers Association Settlement Administrator and EPIQ Class Action & Claims Solutions, Inc.
United States v. David Tensley, Jr.
as 12-3216
Plaintiff - Appellee:
United States of America
Defendant - Appellant:
David Jerome Tensley, Jr.
REAVES et al v. BLACK FARMERS ASSOCIATION SETTLEMENT ADMINISTRATOR
as 1:2012cv00955
Plaintiff:
FRANKLIN C. REAVES, SARAH SIMON-ARNOLD, ROGER ARNOLD and others
Defendant:
BLACK FARMERS ASSOCIATION SETTLEMENT ADMINISTRATOR
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
