Cases 1 - 10 of 23
CICCOTELLI v. DISCOVERY, INC. et al
as 2:2021cv05566
Plaintiff:
ALEX CICCOTELLI
Defendant:
DISCOVERY, INC., ROBERT J MIRON, ROBERT R BECK and others
Cause Of Action: 12 U.S.C. § 22
WHITFIELD v. COVANTA HOLDING CORPORATION et al
as 2:2021cv04200
Plaintiff:
MATTHEW WHITFIELD
Defendant:
COVANTA HOLDING CORPORATION, SAMUEL ZELL, DAVID M BARSE and others
Cause Of Action: 12 U.S.C. § 22
GOODEN v. WALTON et al
as 2:2021cv00190
Defendant:
AARON WALTON, EPCOT CRENSHAW, THOMAS S. MULLER and others
Plaintiff:
WARREN E. GOODEN
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
DEGENS v. FEDERAL BUREAU OF INVESTIGATION et al
as 2:2020cv00971
Defendant:
FEDERAL BUREAU OF INVESTIGATION and DAVID M. HARDY
Plaintiff:
ANTHONY ANGELO DEGENS
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 552
Securities and Exchange Commission v. Mahan
as 1:2020cv00487
Plaintiff:
Securities and Exchange Commission
Defendant:
David M. Mahan
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 77
PHILLIPS v. CARSON SMITHFIELD, LLC
as 2:2019cv01664
Defendant:
CARSON SMITHFIELD, LLC
Plaintiff:
DAVID M. PHILLIPS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
KENNEDY v. THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA et al
as 5:2019cv00748
Defendant:
COUNTY OF LEHIGH PENNSYLVANIA, PENNSYLVANIA STATE POLICE, DAVID J. MacMAIN and others
Plaintiff:
EDWARD THOMAS KENNEDY
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961
KENNEDY v. THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA et al
as 2:2019cv00153
Defendant:
COUNTY OF LEHIGH PENNSYLVANIA, PENNSYLVANIA STATE POLICE, DAVID J. MACMAIN and others
Plaintiff:
EDWARD THOMAS KENNEDY
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961
KENNEDY v. COUNTY OF LEHIGH PENNSYLVANIA et al
as 5:2019cv00163
Defendant:
COUNTY OF LEHIGH PENNSYLVANIA, DAVID J. MACMAIN, DAVID M. BACKENSTOE and others
Plaintiff:
EDWARD THOMAS KENNEDY
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961
Edward D. Jones & Co., L.P. v. Kolter
as 1:2018cv01994
Plaintiff:
Edward D. Jones & Co., L.P.
Defendant:
David M. Kolter, Jr.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
