Cases 1 - 10 of 13
Robert Wilkins v. David Shaw
as 21-7272
Plaintiff / Appellant:
ROBERT WILKINS
Defendant / Appellee:
DAVID SHAW, Administrator, JAMES MCVIGOR, Sheriff, PHIL CORBETT, Chief and others
Defendant:
UNITED STATES MARSHALS
Armand Calhoun v. Adison Richards, et al
as 21-35598
Plaintiff / Appellant:
ARMAND R. CALHOUN
Defendant / Appellee:
ADISON RICHARDS, PHILIP THORNTON, JENNIFER AMMONS and others
Roberts v. Genting New York LLC
as 21-833
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Dalia Toppin, Natalio Herrera, Judith Allen and others
Defendant / Appellee:
Genting New York LLC, DBA Resorts World Casino New York City
Shaw et al v. Takeda Pharmaceuticals U S A Inc et al
as LAW/6:13-cv-02710
Plaintiff:
David Shaw and Mary Shaw
Defendant:
Takeda Pharmaceuticals USA, Inc., Takeda Pharmaceuticals America Inc, Takeda Global Research & Development Center Inc and others
USA v. Emmitt Shaw
as 12-5704
Plaintiff - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant:
EMMITT DAVID SHAW
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2012cv01015
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2012at00520
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Sam Bess, et al v. Matthew Cate, et al
as 10-15990
Plaintiff - Appellant:
SAM BESS
Plaintiff:
RYAN COUCH, KENNETH JIMENEZ and BARNABE TORRES
Defendant - Appellee:
MATTHEW CATE, DAVID SHAW, RODERICK HICKMAN and others
Ryan Couch, et al v. Matthew Cate, et al
as 09-15599
Plaintiff - Appellant:
RYAN COUCH, KENNETH JIMENEZ and BARNABE TORRES
Defendant - Appellee:
MATTHEW CATE, DAVID SHAW, JEANNE S. WOODFORD and others
Matthew Cate, et al v. USDC-CES
as 09-70512
:
In re: MATTHEW CATE and DAVID SHAW
Petitioner:
MATTHEW CATE and DAVID SHAW
Respondent:
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA, SACRAMENTO
Real Party In Interest:
SAM BESS
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
